this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
73 points (97.4% liked)

Webcomics

348 readers
1 users here now

Are you a reader of webcomics? Or an author or artist? Let's discuss! Discover something new, share recommendations, or share your original work! Self promotion is okay, but keep it to one post per couple of weeks. Please feel free to post in the threads section. The Microblog is currently more active but less visible.

founded 1 year ago
 
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] street_pigeons 3 points 10 months ago

Good job on posting the source

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

A while back I came to the conclusion that "No wishing about wishing." ought to be the wording of that particular genie rule. It prevents a whole heap of paradoxical wish behaviour as well as preventing simply asking for more. The neuralyser though, might be a loophole depending on whether the count of three is internal or external to the genie.

Consider: If the count is somehow external to the genie, the genie would attempt to grant a fourth wish and fail, or else be re-granted knowledge of the wish count for this particular wisher, if not necessarily the content of those wishes, at some point soon after the neuralyser has done its work.

There's something of the Pinocchio paradox about this.

On the other hand, the neuralyser is a wish that affects wishing, which is technically a breach of the rule that outlaws asking for more wishes, so maybe it's that which triggers something bad to happen with or without the genie's knowledge.

Either way, a smart genie - and aren't they all supposed to be monkey's-paw-level tricksters? - would undoubtedly externalise the wish count the moment any concept of forgetting came into play, assuming it wasn't external already.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

The dude forgot to wish for Ray Bans so he also forgot all about it. Maybe that's the bad thing that happened this time.

[–] Dagnet 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

"I wish that my wishes don't count towards the cap of 3"

[–] EdibleFriend 3 points 10 months ago

I wish this guy never got his wishes

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Granted - it now counts towards a cap of 2 wishes, and you just used 1 of your 2 wishes.

[–] agent_flounder 3 points 10 months ago

This guy genies

[–] Dagnet 1 points 10 months ago

Would still be a cap of 3 with 1 already being used? 1/3

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

I'd probably start with the neuralyzer and test it first before making any other wishes.