this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
172 points (93.4% liked)

World News

31540 readers
514 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://vlemmy.net/post/553347

Alternative title: Musk’s X Corp. threatens to sue Meta over Twitter “copycat” Threads

top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

It's finally happening! We did it, Lemmy!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Hoping they settle this in the ring.

[–] mytornadoisresting 48 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Awesome. They can stay busy fighting each other while we happily go on without them over here on the fediverse.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm just worried this could result in a ruling that will fuck up the fediverse somehow.

[–] kartonrealista 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Eh, I don't think any one company can own the concept of microblogging. If Twitter and Tumblr both existed for a long time and there were no lawsuits then this is just a nothing burger, no?

[–] FartsWithAnAccent 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In any sane world, yeah almost definitely.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Never discount the possibility of American courts deciding something which is horribly damaging for the world of technology.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

yeah, this feels like a walking advertisement for the fediverse.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Spiro's letter complains about Meta hiring some of the many workers who were laid off or resigned from Twitter in the eight months since Musk bought the company.

"Over the past year, Meta has hired dozens of former Twitter employees... these employees had and continue to have access to Twitter's trade secrets and other highly confidential information," Spiro wrote in the letter to Zuckerberg. The workers, he alleged, "owe ongoing obligations to Twitter," and many "have improperly retained Twitter documents and electronic devices."

"We fired a bunch of people and you hired them to build the same thing they built for us! Not fair not fair!"

[–] dvlsg 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The workers, he alleged, “owe ongoing obligations to Twitter,”

What a strange argument. If I work for someone, and they fire me, I still have ongoing obligations to them?

Great, I'll expect my paycheck to be deposited as usual, then.

[–] kofe 7 points 1 year ago

I'm curious if it's referring to NDAs maybe? That would imply some form of obligation to maintain secrets I guess. Otherwise yeah, makes no sense to me

[–] totallynotarobot 6 points 1 year ago

Funny story - many paycheques were not, in fact, deposited.

[–] Raphael 23 points 1 year ago

I'm rooting for a long drawn out fight.

Wait.... that sounded really american, didn't it. Maybe I should ship lawyers to both sides.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

An expensive legal campaign is yet another excuse for Twitter to go bankrupt that ignores the fact that the leveraged buyout was already a death sentence - like almost every other.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I can't believe I'm rooting for Zuckerberg over that walking shitstain Musk here. WTAF.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

It does feel weird.

[–] Chainweasel 5 points 1 year ago

It's like watching two people you hate fight, Wait it's actually exactly that.
Anyway, I'm not rooting for anyone to win, I just want to see a good bloody match where both sides get some good hits in and lose some teeth.

[–] totallynotarobot 14 points 1 year ago

Imagine my disappointment that this does not appear to be the slap fight originally proposed, just in a courtroom. Legal battle booooring.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

....let them fight.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

They are like kids

[–] Cl249099 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] saltesc 1 points 1 year ago

Oh, I'm all for this 🍿

Everyone's a winner! So long as they're in the spectator area.

[–] twistedtxb 7 points 1 year ago
[–] harry_assman 7 points 1 year ago

Two wiener kids having a pissing contest on an electric fence.

[–] answersplease77 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Was Threads behind Twitter's login close off and server attack or whatever the heck happened to it? It completely killed Twitter

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, many suspect that’s caused by Musk not paying his Google cloud bill and his services being downgraded as the first step Google takes when they want a customer to pay them.

Musk put up the login only view of Twitter and immediately caused Twitter’s own DDoS because that screen would keep trying to load tweets even though it couldn’t, repeatedly and very quickly.

Musk also blamed this action on data scrapers, but people see the timing of this as too coincidental for it not to be the Google cloud thing.

Musk also backed off when he realized Twitter was disappearing from Google as it could no longer index Tweets.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

No, that was from either Twitter DDOSing itself, or getting rate limited because they refused to pay for hosting services.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

So maybe this is why they used ActivityPub. Plausible deniability and accelerated development. Maybe this has nothing to do with the Fediverse. 🤔

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Really, the only way X Corp. has any way to get Meta to stop would be on anti-trust grounds, which would be hilarious.

[–] w00master 2 points 1 year ago

Elon has nothing on this. I’m not rooting for either but this threat doesn’t have much legs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Imagine how hilarious it would be to see Musk calling Zuck a pedo.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If this is a way for Musk to dodge getting his ass beat by Zuckerbot 3000 at the coleseum he's got another thing coming.

load more comments
view more: next ›