this post was submitted on 06 May 2024
170 points (92.1% liked)

Technology

60140 readers
2761 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


On Saturday, Jack Dorsey posted on X about grants for open protocols from his philanthropic Start Small initiative.

Dorsey first announced Bluesky in 2019, back when he was still CEO of Twitter.

He wrote that Twitter (now X) was “funding a small independent team of up to five open source architects, engineers, and designers to develop an open and decentralized standard for social media.”

Since then, Bluesky has become an independent public benefit corporation, led by CEO Jay Graber, with VC backing, and it opened to the general public in February.

Dorsey appears to have deleted his Bluesky account at some point last year, though his departure was only acknowledged at the time by a smattering of social media posts.

In addition to dropping corporate news, he’s also weighed in on the beef between Drake and Kendrick Lamar, unfollowed nearly every other account, and posted, “don’t depend on corporations to grant you rights.


The original article contains 268 words, the summary contains 153 words. Saved 43%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Lemminary 37 points 7 months ago (3 children)

"don’t depend on corporations to grant you rights"

Says this guy who literally egged on Musk to buy up Twitter and turn it into the shit hole it is today. 😂 Can't make this shit up.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

This AI shithow butchered it. He actually said:

don’t depend on corporations to grant you rights. defend them yourself using freedom technology. (you’re on one)

He's back to praising Musk. He is literally referring to Shitter as "freedom technology." This guy can go die in a fucking ditch.

Pretty sure he left Bluesky because he was mad about them having a block feature. Basically when Musk turned a block into a mute, he turned tail from people actually trying to build a not-dogshit-product and ran back to his former dogshit product.

[–] Lemminary 19 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That's arguably worse! He's pissy that people aren't allowed to freely harass others and calls that a right becuz muh freeze peach. What an enormous shit head.

[–] captainlezbian 2 points 7 months ago

Yeah he’s been that guy for a while.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

"Go die for using the social media platform I don't like" doesn't seem unreasonable at all.

[–] partial_accumen 12 points 7 months ago

Says this guy who literally egged on Musk to buy up Twitter and turn it into the shit hole it is today. 😂 Can’t make this shit up.

As bad as it is for the public, it was brilliant business move. Pre-Musk Twitter was barely making any net income (post-Must it makes ZERO net income). It was a profitable business, but just barely, and had been unprofitable for many years.

Goading Musk into committing to buy Twitter at the inflated high stock price allowed Twitter shareholders to cash out at a far higher value than they ever could have trying to run Twitter as a money making venture.

Keep in mind, I'm not saying we don't all lose because Twitter is a shithole now, but from a purely (cutthroat) business perspective the sale was a boon.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Honestly, with the unfathomable amount of money he was set the make from that deal, I dont blame him for doing it.

It's a good message too, if you ignore who said it and why.