this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
129 points (97.8% liked)

Not The Onion

12359 readers
1871 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

But the Supreme Court’s April 12 ruling that they are in the transportation business opens the door for them to take the dispute to court.

That’s because the FAA — in its very first section — exempts from its mandate several types of workers, such as railroad employees and “any other class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nandeEbisu 42 points 6 months ago (2 children)

In this case yes, because transportation workers have special protections, but it can just as easily apply to strip transportation workers of rights given to bakery workers in different circumstances.

I think it's kind of neutral.

[–] almar_quigley 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

But at least it’s defined now so they don’t have wiggle room to take advantage of grey areas.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Every category has a surrounding grey area. Maximizing the number of categories is a path to maximizing the total grey area.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

I think we should simplify our laws so that everyone gets the same protections.