this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
377 points (81.9% liked)

Lefty Memes

4290 readers
1370 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

0. Only post socialist memes

That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)

1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here

Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.

2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such,

as well as condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.

3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.

That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).

4. No Bigotry.

The only dangerous minority is the rich.

5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.

We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)

6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.

Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.

7. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

(This is not a definitive list, the spirit of the other rules still counts! Eventual duplicates with other rules are for emphasis.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Double property taxes on owners, but give back a property tax credit on owner-occupants, so that the effective tax rate on owner occupants falls, and the only people paying the doubled tax rate are investors.

Statutorily increase the tax rate and credit when owner occupancy is below 80%, and reduce the tax rate and credit when owner occupancy rises above 90%.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Wouldn't landlords simply pass those costs onto their renters?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

Introduce rent control

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Yes, and no. They are more likely to switch to a different strategy, such as a private mortgage or land contract. Large apartment complexes will likely convert to condominiums or co-ops.

Basically, if we raise the rate and credit high enough, the landlord will be able to get a better return with one of these other options than they could get from renting.

All of these other options are permanent agreements, with terms established from the start. The landlord can't arbitrarily raise rent every year. The tenant gains equity from day one.

Basically, I'm killing the concept of renting. It needs to die in a goddamn fire.

[–] themeatbridge 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, you're not going to tax parasites off the host. We need regulations limiting corporate ownership of residential property.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So long as the property is desirable to corporate owners, they will be fighting to get around those regulations.

By increasing the tax rate substantially on non-occupant owners, we make residential property far less lucrative for corporate owners.

When they can make more money selling and lending on the property than they can make renting it, mission accomplished.

[–] themeatbridge 2 points 6 months ago

So long as you have blood, ticks will try to bite you. Increasing the taxes would be a good way to increase tax revenue, and we should do it, and corporate real estate investors will fight it like hell, but there isn't any reason to think it will discourage predatory behaviors.

If they can make more money selling and lending on the property, you get the 2008 bubble all over again.

Capitalists are going to capitalize. Regulation is the only weapon against abuse. Taxes are a good start, but it won't be enough.

[–] thesporkeffect 2 points 6 months ago

Defense in depth. One's a more difficult target and it'd be foolish to abandon a near term improvement because we want a better option 10 years down the road. Do both.

[–] SeattleRain 1 points 4 months ago

No because not all landlords are capitalized equally. A new investor with a huge mortgage would. An old landlord with paid off property wouldn't. Unless they collude.

[–] Landless2029 8 points 6 months ago

I think it should be a sliding scale.

Standard property tax on owner occupied home.

Landlord tax on additional home/unit. (Like vacation home).

Additional fee for vacant home/unit. Serious one like 20-50% market rate of unit per month vacant. This helps with company owned units and foreign bodies buying up real estate and hoarding it.

Additional fee/tax per extra unit owned. DISMANTLE REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT FIRMS. This would cause them to sell off homes.

Use proceeds of these taxes and fees explicitly for rental assistance/home buying programs.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

For starters, massively increase taxation on every property over PPR, and ban corporate ownership of standalone housing.

[–] freshcow 2 points 6 months ago

Brilliant, love it. Anything to discourage housing hoarders will be a benefit to society.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen 1 points 6 months ago

Also fix rent rates and divorce them from speculative housing prices.