this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
136 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7204 readers
112 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre delivered a fiery speech Thursday that depicted the government's latest budget as a threat to the country's future, and suggested a number of new social programs will get a second look if he leads the next government.

He also claimed Ottawa's push into pharmacare could dismantle private drug insurance and leave Canadians with inferior coverage and higher taxes to pay for it all.

Health Minister Mark Holland, meanwhile, accused the Conservative leader of trying to whip up fear by raising "fake boogeyman" to distract from a program that makes contraceptives and diabetes treatments more affordable for everyone.

While he attacks the Liberals' spending plan, Poilievre is under pressure to explain what he'd cut to fulfil his stated promise to "fix the budget" if he's elected.

In an interview with Radio-Canada, Poilievre was noncommittal on whether child care, dental care and pharmacare would be dismantled by a government led by him β€” but he raised questions about the programs' effectiveness.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

24.6m is more than 15m as CBC is impartial it is better for them to list the larger number

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

No, being "impartial" would be highlighting both the number of covered and not covered so the reader appreciates just how many people the UCP wants to leave behind. "Big number is bigger" is not how impartiality is measured.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

That would be unbiased

You can hide information without being partial to a side. You can’t hide information without being biased

[–] jorp 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why isn't CBC reporting on all of the people I didn't murder!? It's a far bigger number

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

With cops and firefighters they often do that