this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
479 points (98.6% liked)

News

23638 readers
3069 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] testfactor 54 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I feel like this has always been the case? There's not a lot of precedence to be sure, but people have been operating under that assumption for a long time.

That's why, if you need to keep the cops from looking in your phone, you should use a password. Can't be compelled to give a password.

The classic example is a safe. There's tons of court precedence that you can be compelled to give the cops a physical key to unlock it if there is one, but you can't be compelled to tell them the combo if it's a dial lock.

[–] deweydecibel 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Fingerprint unlocking is always secondary to there being a pin which is equivalent to a password.

As long as you turn your phone off before approaching/being approached by cops, or before they demand that you unlock it, you'll be fine. You don't even have to take it out of your pocket or look at it to turn it off, just hold the power button for a few seconds.

If you're even more paranoid, enable the setting that requires a PIN code to reactivate the fingerprint unlock after 30 minutes or something.

Or force it to demand the pin after a single failure of the fingerprint unlock and then let your finger kind of slip when they tell you to unlock it.

There are countless ways to mitigate the risks here. You don't have to forgo fingerprint unlock entirely.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

I use tasker to automatically lockdown my phone if it experiences too much acceleration. I figure that if I'm being thrown to the ground, I probably want to lockdown my phone. A sharp tap on my pocket works pretty well too.

[–] ripcord 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Or instead of powering off, enable lockdown mode.

[–] WildPalmTree 1 points 8 months ago

Finally someone that commented with a keyword I could search for in my settings (Samsung). Thank you!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Is this some weird free speech thing?

[–] testfactor 34 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Nah, it's the 5th Amendment. The right against self incrimination. You can't be forced to testify against yourself.

Basically, I can't put you on the stand in the court room and be like, "did you do it?"

You're always aloud to just stay silent and make the prosecution have to prove their case without your help.

But they are allowed to search you physically and take any physical things they want as evidence, be it a ring of keys or your fingerprint.

[–] meco03211 14 points 8 months ago

To add onto that, it doesn't prevent them from breaking into a phone or safe. If they have probable cause or a warrant to search either, they have the legal right to search them. Whether they choose to search them or not given this probable cause depends on the crime being investigated, the difficulty of successfully obtaining the contents, and overall desire to solve the crime/fuck with you. They probably aren't drilling out a huge safe for a jaywalking case. For a murder case, they are probably leaving you with a broken and useless safe and all the contents confiscated.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Note that in many jurisdictions you must invoke your right of silence. Other countries often have similar laws and requirements too.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It's also highly dependent on how incredibly racist the judge and cops are. Warren Demesme had his 5th amendment rights taken away from him because he demanded, quote, "a lawyer, dawg." The Louisiana supreme court, who I'm legally not allowed to voice my opinions on, pretended that this was in some way ambiguous, and so his statements made after this clear demand for a lawyer could still be used against him in court.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago

I think it’s a fifth amendment thing about not having to incriminate yourself.