this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
21 points (92.0% liked)

Casual Conversation

2367 readers
503 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 01/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I overheard some kids at the swimming pool playing rock, paper, applesauce. I was amused by the questions that brought up.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

...Why replace the scissors when rock is clearly the weakest link? How does applesauce beat rock or paper? More importantly, what happened to these children that would even make them assosciate applesauce with rocks or paper? How do you even make an "applesauce" gesture with just your hand? Why play rock-paper-~~scissors~~ applesauce at the swimming pool instead of the dozens of pool-specific games already available? How do you fit a three-syllable word like /ˌap.ple'sauce/ into the one/two/two-syllable cadence of /ˌrockˌpa.per.'scis.sors/? Is it an inside joke? A warning of "don't play with scissors" taken too far? Have they independently developed the game of rock-paper-scissors from first principles and simply didn't consider scissors as a mechanic? Are they in a scissor-based cult and trying not to speak their Lord's name in vain? Why at the swimming pool?

I, too, am amused by these questions. That said, this is going to haunt me.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well, paper really won't have the same utility once you introduce applesauce. And applesauce can't defeat a rock in a meaningful way.

[–] Today 4 points 10 months ago

You can cover a rock in applesauce such that no one wants to touch it. If you have the little plastic containers of applesauce, you could smash one of those with a rock. I'm not sure who wins....

[–] Moghul 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

rock is clearly the weakest link

Surely paper is the weakest link in classic RPS

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Nah man, think about it, rock makes no goddamn sense from a lore perspective. Scissors cut paper, sure, I can see that as a win condition. Rock breaks scissors? I guess that's not wrong, but like, who's out here breaking scissors with rocks on the regular? How did the rock become the scissor's greatest nemesis? Then we get to the big one: Paper covers rock? You're telling me this is such a devastating blow that rock has no choice but to resign in disgrace? You really want me to believe that a fist-sized rock couldn't just plow through your standard sheet of 8.5x11" ANSI Letterhead like it's, well... paper? The whole thing is propaganda by Big Paper and they've got us drilling it into our kids' heads from day 1, and I'm not having it.