this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
324 points (93.3% liked)

News

23302 readers
3240 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Jamie Lloyd Company has hit back after its production of Shakespeare’s “Romeo & Juliet” has been the subject of what they call a “barrage of deplorable racial abuse” aimed at an unnamed cast member.

The play, directed by Jamie Lloyd (“Sunset Boulevard”), stars “Spider-Man: No Way Home” star Tom Holland as Romeo and Francesca Amewaduh-Rivers (“Sex Education”) as Juliet. 

On Friday, the Jamie Lloyd Company issued a statement, saying: “Following the announcement of our ‘Romeo & Juliet’ cast, there has been a barrage of deplorable racial abuse online directed towards a member of our company. This must stop.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] partial_accumen 130 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Following the announcement of our ‘Romeo & Juliet’ cast, there has been a barrage of deplorable racial abuse online directed towards a member of our company. This must stop.”

I'm guessing the racist jerks complaining about the casting would be really upset if they knew that Juliet was played by a dude named Robert Goffe in the very first performance of the play in 1597. source These bigots are so busy complaining about a replacement in race for the actor playing Juliet that they're not even consistent asking for Juliet to be played the original gender of the actor in the first performance. Where is your consistency, bigots?

[–] [email protected] 65 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Also observe how those "replacement in race" people are completely silent on the 3 body problem show that made pretty much all of the Chinese characters from the book into westerners

[–] partial_accumen 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I haven't watched the Netflix show. Do they actually cast western actors in the roles during the Chinese Cultural Revolution (purge)?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Ye Wenjie is the only asian main characters that are completely true to the books and casted accordingly.

Jin Cheng and Da Shi (replaces Cheng Xin) are the other Asian casted main characters. The rest of the main. Cast ist European/American

[–] LeroyJenkins 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Da Shi was not British in the book lmao wtf

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Sorry - moved him to the "Asian cast but changed character" part of my comment.

Overlooked that part since his casting was literally perfect imho

[–] RizzRustbolt 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yes. That part is set in Nebraska now.

[–] partial_accumen 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Their version has a communist driven purge mass murdering artists and academics in Nebraska ?!

[–] TrejoPhD 6 points 7 months ago

No. That person is messing with you.

The China stuff in the past still happens in China.

The present day stuff is a bunch of diff races now, not just Chinese.

[–] LeroyJenkins 3 points 7 months ago

who said everybody is completely silent? nobody in the states aside from sci Fi nerds knew about 3 body until now. and for all the Chinese people I've asked, myself included, who read the book before the show came out are pissed they replaced the Chinese hero characters with not Chinese people and made all the Chinese people the bad guys. it's fucked and not a correct comparison here...

[–] Pronell 27 points 7 months ago

Thanks for the historical context - I knew most of it personally but not the name of the actor who played Juliet first.

It's nice to know that kind of information has survived so far. History is weird like that.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

Hey! Robby was white! That’s the most important part. Whatever, the right is fucking stupid.

Well done with the historical reference.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I understand what you're going for, but it was likely played by a male because women weren't allowed to perform.

[–] partial_accumen 20 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I understand what you’re going for, but it was likely played by a male because women weren’t allowed to perform.

You're almost there. Keep going!

To quote another Shakespeare play (The Tempest): "What's past is prologue".

The reason the black actor for Juliet is receiving threats is because they don't want her to be allowed to perform. So those historically that were so intolerant of a woman performing on stage that we see as silly and backwards are equally silly and backwards as today's racists threatening this modern day actor for the part of Juliet.

[–] LeroyJenkins -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

to be honest, I think you're incorrect here and your comparison isn't accurate here. a true comparison to men playing an Italian Juliet would be the black actors in questions playing italian people that are specifically written in the source material... which is weird and color washing. no ambiguous "they're a fairy tale people" stuff. if they plan on keeping to the feel and historical context of the play (which I can't tell from their marketing materials), then it's honestly super weird for black actors to play white people. are they going to use Italian accents? are they all Moores now? or is canon thrown out the window? if so, why not just make a Lion King type production where it's based on the Shakespeare story instead of just play itself? why can't production companies create original, creative roles for bipoc actors that are memorable and put them in a spotlight in a positive way instead of doing this played out controversial marketing shit that companies KNOW will stir up trouble to generate interest on their productions.

[–] partial_accumen 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

to be honest, I think you’re incorrect here and your comparison isn’t accurate here. a true comparison to men playing an Italian Juliet would be the black actors in questions playing italian people that are specifically written in the source material…

You're welcome to your opinion of course. I think you're trying very hard to make the "Italian" part relevant, for Romeo and Juliet, but it feels like thats an argument grasping at straws. Yes, the story is about Italians, but the original actor in 1597, Robert Goffe, wasn't Italian either he was English source. No one, except you, has trying to make any actors playing this role across the last 450 years contingent on being Italian.

then it’s honestly super weird for black actors to play white people.

Oh? I think you should really employ some self reflection why you arrived at that statement. Why does that make you so uncomfortable? These are actors standing on a stage, wearing costumes, speaking monologues to an audience, and some characters pretending to fight and stab each other to death. The sets are made from cardboard, plywood, and the cheapest paint they can buy. Why is it you can suspend disbelief around all those other things that don't match reality, but when it comes to the skin color of an actor, its a bridge too far?

When the actor Leslie Lloyd Odom Jr, a black actor, played the role of the actual historical figure Aaron Burr in the original Broadway production of Hamilton, were you equally uncomfortable? Were you broken out of the story of Hamilton's life and unable immerse yourself in history because a black man was acting the part of a historically white charactor? If so, I would have figured it would have been the awesome hip-hop numbers that weren't quite period correct, not the color of skin of an actor.

why can’t production companies create original, creative roles for bipoc actors that are memorable and put them in a spotlight in a positive way

That's is already happening.

instead of doing this played out controversial marketing shit that companies KNOW will stir up trouble to generate interest on their productions.

I don't think they're only casting these actors to stir up controversy. Lloyd Odom Jr was amazing in Hamilton! Nothing about the color of his skin subtracted from my enjoyment of the play. He's a powerhouse of an actor that absolutely nailed that role.

Why do you feel we, as a society, should be gatekeeping the last 500+ years of western storytelling to only white actors? You would stand before a room of 100 actors, perhaps 40 of them non-white and proclaim proudly "these hundreds of years of script are off limits to you, because you're not white"?

[–] LeroyJenkins -2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

To your first point, English play, English actors. Europeans playing Europeans. not weird. very basic concept.

Why does that make you so uncomfortable?

because if it were the other way around for any other race, it would make me uncomfortable also. I don't want Europeans to be casted as Asian characters in a classic Asian story. or Europeans playing Africans in a classic African play. this would largely be considered white washing and is largely frowned upon.

Leslie Lloyd Odom Jr

You largely ignored my crucial statement that if the medium wants to keep the FEEL and historical context, then casting consideration is appropriate. if you make a historical rap musical, then the rules are different. clearly LMM was not trying to capture the FEEL of that historical period.

Even if you don't think this is controversial marketing, it still is. it's causing a stir and we're talking about it. when it comes out, well both at least check it out probably in some form or another.

You would stand before a room of 100 actors, perhaps 40 of them non-white and proclaim proudly "these hundreds of years of script are off limits to you, because you're not white"?

yes, if I'm a casting director trying to cast actors for authentic white characters.