UK Nature and Environment

388 readers

43 users here now

General Instance Rules:

No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
Do not spam or abuse network features.

Community Specific Rules:

Keep posts UK-specific. There are other places on Lemmy to post articles which relate to global environmental issues (e.g. slrpnk.net).
Keep comments in English so that they can be appropriately moderated.

Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.

Our autumn banner is a shot of maple leaves by Hossenfeffer.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

296

Public has no right to swim in sea, claims firm that dumped sewage at bathing spot (inews.co.uk)

submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

South West Water is claiming it has no legal obligation to keep rivers and seawater clean of sewage in its defence against a Devon swimmer who is taking the water company to court.

Jo Bateman, who attempts to swim every day off the coast of Exmouth, is taking legal action against South West Water, claiming its frequent sewage discharges into the sea have taken away her legal right to a public “amenity”.

However, in its defence to Ms Bateman’s claim, seen by i, the water firm states no one has a legal right to swim in the sea.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] cynar 56 points 7 months ago (3 children)

If it's fine to dump whatever they want into the sea and rivers, what's to stop someone dumping a large amount of concrete directly over their vents? If it happens to fill and block their pipes, that's their problem.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 7 months ago (2 children)

“sorry but due to increased vandalism in your area, we’re raising your water bill by 50%. feel free to complain to your MP who let us do this on the basis that we made a large donation to his re-election campaign and offered him a cushy director job when he’s finished. also, we’ll be doubling our shareholder dividend this year. thanks!”

[–] cynar 16 points 7 months ago

Do you honestly think is NOT filling their pipes with concrete would stop them raising prices by 50%, if they thought they could get away with it?

[–] Mango 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm sorry right back. Points gun

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

guns

britain

choose one :(

[–] Mango 1 points 7 months ago

I choose guns.

[–] Lemminary 24 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I nether condemn or condone these actions, but if anyone needs cement for whatever reason I have some leftover in the garage.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Their lawyers

The same ones that made up this stupid defense and have zero need to honor it

[–] I_Has_A_Hat 7 points 7 months ago

I know it's often a lawyers job to throw anything and everything at the wall to see what sticks, but I feel there needs to be some consequences for bad faith, or in this case inhuman, arguments. Like, it fully reveals the priorities of the company and shows there is significant culture rot.