this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024

598 points (99.5% liked)

News

23312 readers

4489 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

598

Feds Recently Hit Cargo Giant In Baltimore Disaster For Silencing Whistleblowers (www.levernews.com)

submitted 7 months ago by Stopthatgirl7 to c/news

115 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The company that chartered the cargo ship that destroyed the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore was recently sanctioned by regulators for blocking its employees from directly reporting safety concerns to the U.S. Coast Guard — in violation of a seaman whistleblower protection law, according to regulatory filings reviewed by The Lever.

Eight months before a Maersk Line Limited-chartered cargo ship crashed into the Baltimore bridge, likely killing six people and injuring others, the Labor Department sanctioned the shipping conglomerate for retaliating against an employee who reported unsafe working conditions aboard a Maersk-operated boat. In its order, the department found that Maersk had “a policy that requires employees to first report their concerns to [Maersk]... prior to reporting it to the [Coast Guard] or other authorities.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 65 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

There's 100% going to be a serious civil and criminal investigation into this. Both of those are going to take a long time. Meanwhile Biden pledging to rebuild the bridge as fast as possible is absolutely the right thing to do. Givesomefucks cynically claiming "Biden bad" for this incident that happened yesterday is just not based in reality

[+] [email protected] -27 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

It's a cynical hot-take but history has shown that the Whitehouse [GOP and neolibs alike] usually does bail out the multi billion dollar conglomerates so historically speaking, they are probably right.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

But there isn't even any reason to think Maersk needs a bailout right now. We have no idea what went wrong with the ship that sent it adrift. And Maersk has insurance that is likely going to be paying a pretty penny in damages to the families of the people who died, the State of Maryland, and other injured parties, and even after that they have incredibly deep pockets

[+] [email protected] -17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

The "bailout" will come when the bill for the bridge needs to be paid. Mark my words, I'll consume a shoe if taxpayers pay nothing.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Maersk is not going to literally pay the bill for rebuilding this bridge because that's not how this works. The government will recoup the money through fines and lawsuits. Maersk isn't even a US company; while it's an important company in global trade, there's not going to be an appetite to not hold them accountable for this, and they have plenty money to pay whatever fines or damages may be coming down the pipe.

Bailouts have only happened when a company is nearing insolvency, and Maersk is nowhere near insolvency. If it were to at some point in the future, which is unlikely, the EU would be responsible for any intervention, not the US

[–] [email protected] -3 points 7 months ago

The government will recoup the money through fines and lawsuits.

doubt

[+] [email protected] -12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I guarantee you that we'll see bankruptcies & a billion dollar fine over this.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Maersk? Bankrupt? Homie stop embarrassing yourself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maersk

The company's 2023 annual revenue was US$51.1 billion.[2] In the 2023 Forbes Global 2000, Møller-Maersk was ranked as the 174th largest public company in the world.[5]

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

Maersk will, of course, be fine. Their "independently owned" subsidiary responsible for maintenance might have to shutter until they can file the paperwork to recreate it with a new name and the same "standard" policies and "experienced" people.

I don't know if this resembles their cooperate structure, but one thing I do know is that the company and it's shareholders will not suffer any significant inconvience.