this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
88 points (94.0% liked)

PlayStation

5247 readers
37 users here now

The PlayStation community for Lemmy! Come and join us for daily news and discussions!

Rules:

  1. Stay on topic.
  2. No hate speech or personal attacks.
  3. No console wars or PC elitism. We are all gamers.
  4. Be a decent human.
  5. No piracy talk, links, or directions to copy-written content. Emulation discussions are allowed.
  6. No NSFW content, shilling, self promotion, ads, spam, low effort posts, memes, trolling, etc.
  7. All bots must have mod permission prior to implementation and must follow instance-wide rules. For lemmy.world bot rules click here
  8. Do not make false reports. If you believe a post is a borderline rule break that is fine, but using the report feature as a super-downvote is not allowed. You will be met with a warning, followed by a ban for abuse of the report feature.
  9. Have fun!

Other Gaming Communities:

Remote Play Resources:


For questions, collabs, or really anything, message me directly at: @cosmicsploogedrizzle:matrix.org


SEO Tags: PlayStation 5 , PS5 , Game , Gaming , Games , Sony , Studios , Nintendo , Xbox , Microsoft , Next Gen , Unreal , Decima Engine , Exclusive , Dualshock , Dualsense , Dual Sense , SIE , Sony Interactive Entertainment , HBO , The Last of Us , Horizon , Spiderman , Spider-man , Spider Man , God of War , PSVR , Virtual Reality , MLB , Returnal , Death Stranding , Ratchet and Clank , Ghost of Tsushima , Demon’s Souls , Naughty Dog , Santa Monica , Housemarque , Sucker Punch , Bungie , Destiny , Insomniac , Guerilla , Bend , Asobi , San Diego

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

You claiming it didn't affect anything doesn't make it reality.

It's fundamentally not possible for it not to change the design process of a game. Literally every game ever made with micro-transactions has been affected in one way or another, unless the first time the idea was discussed was after the game was shipped. "Just cosmetics" guarantees cosmetics that would have been earned with gameplay get taken away to be put behind a paywall, and all of the exploration and discovery involved in earning them is gone.

All microtransactions make games worse, and all microtransactions are bad.

[–] echo64 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

it's the same system that was in the first game they just let idiots buy a thing to skip the mechanic. Unless you think this future implementation of micro transactions affected the past.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It's not the same system. It's new code, built and tuned for the current version of the game. And it's literally impossible for it not to be affected by the knowledge that microtransactions were going to exist.

But let's play make believe that it was theoretically possible for any microtransaction to not be actively malicious. Lying about it would still make everyone involved a bad person.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

The first game had a built in eternal ferrystone when it saw most of its success.

In no way is paying 3$ for every ferrystone except 5 the same as an eternal ferrystone.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Even things like valve’s key systems in TF2/CS?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Absolutely.

The key gambling system 100% impacted the community, who are the ones to provide gameplay to each other in these games.

All previous Counter-Strike game had a 100% level playing field— all players had access to the same gear and visuals. This equity was very important to gameplay by keeping it competitive, specifically being able to recognize weapons and enemies easily.

CS:GO took a sharp turn with this, effectively ending equity in the game. Not only did you have to spend money if you wanted you or your gear to look like others, but it also made it much more difficult to recognize enemies and gear people were carrying unless you more carefully inspected them. Bits sticking out around corners became much more difficult to recognize.

There is likely much more impact to the game and its development on various levels, but this is a clear example of a negative impact of microtransactions being introduced.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And in TF2, where disabling skins is a console command away? Frankly surprised there’s no similar option in GO/2.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

In TF2, players cannot completely disable the hats. It takes a server operator employing mods or plugins to disable them. The equity was there. It ended with CS:GO.

As well, even if a player could opt out of seeing them, it doesn’t change the fact that the game was built around the gambling and still impacts other players you interact with.

There are some non-competitive games I think handle cosmetic-only micro transactions well (ex: Last Epoch). But I don’t try to fool myself that it doesn’t impact development or gameplay.