this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
50 points (86.8% liked)

Apple

17337 readers
53 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BombOmOm 87 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Sounds like they didn't try very hard.

[–] AA5B 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I can believe it, because of how integrated everything is at Apple. You probably need to bring a lot of iCloud support over (App Store, backups, apis), but that may also require supporting applications and configurations

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

im not fully convinced its api, as there are several times a dev or themselves have proved connecting to the apple service was possible. with message, beeper proved it was possible to chat with imessage users. with icloud, backups could be accessed via an internet browser (therefore theres an already existing api that is platform agnostic as it runs in a browser.)

apple could even just make a PWA and instantly have access to the same api that browsers use to access its cloud on its own, and supporting auto cloud sync wouldn't even have to be at an OS level.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Well, it's not like they said they gave it their best, and I really doubt they did.

They might have had a couple of trained monkeys bashing typewriters for 3 years in a room with the sign "Apple Watch for Android team" on the door for all we know. They just said they were "working on it" before scrapping the idea

[–] stoly 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It’s based on a specific piece of hardware in the iPhone called the Secure Enclave that basically keeps all of your PHI in a place that nobody but you can get it. It doesn’t transfer when you get a new phone, for instance, and has to be recreated. I’m betting that an Android app involved some sort of emulator, performance was awful, and they gave up.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Apple is full of shit. I freaking doubt it'll take them a year.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/tim-cook-says-buy-mom-210347694.html#:~:text=Benzinga-,Tim%20Cook%20Says%20'Buy%20Your%20Mom%20An%20iPhone'%20If%20You,Not%20A%20Priority%20For%20Apple&text=Apple%20Inc.,showcased%20his%20sense%20of%20humor.

During a question-and-answer session, a journalist raised the issue of the iPhone’s incompatibility with rich communication services (RCS) messaging, preventing the seamless sharing of video clips with their Android-using mom. It’s been a longstanding issue between Apple and Android devices. Cook acknowledged that it isn’t a top priority for the company. If the reporter wanted to fix the issue, Cook joked, “buy your mom an iPhone.”

Pardon me if we don't give you the benefit of the doubt.

[–] GlitterInfection 2 points 6 months ago

https://www.theverge.com/2023/11/16/23964171/apple-iphone-rcs-support

There's definitely a difference between "not possible" and "not a priority."