this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
497 points (98.3% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

5787 readers
948 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] problematicPanther 37 points 8 months ago (1 children)

he makes a valid argument, just not the one he was trying to make.

[–] MagnyusG 31 points 8 months ago (2 children)

yeah, the simple answer would be that you don't need a doctorate to tattoo, and I would assume most tattoo shops can't exactly support an anesthesiologist financially.

[–] problematicPanther 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

but what about a eunaesthetist?

[–] superduperenigma 6 points 8 months ago

All you really need is good, solid brick.

[–] draneceusrex -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Add that it would be against the Hippocratic oath for a doctor to practice medicine as part of a business that is intentionally wounding you to put ink under your skin.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago

Nah, cosmetic surgeons exist, and they aren't inherently violating professional ethics. Tattooing would be the same kind of elective procedure as breast implants or facelifts.

Also, the Hippocratic oath isn't what people think it is, nor is it even done on a wide basis at this point as an actual oath.