this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
126 points (94.4% liked)

politics

19924 readers
4419 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] oDDmON 58 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Oh fuck you, just pay the woman you despicable dick.

[–] youngGoku 60 points 11 months ago (4 children)

She was already paid. This trial is about campaign finance fraud... Where he illegally used campaign funds for hush money payments to Stormy Daniels with whom he was engaging in... Use your imagination.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 11 months ago

Use your imagination.

No thank you

[–] oDDmON 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

He’s so busy stiffing people right and left, it’s hard to know when he actually did pay anyone.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Very rarely. That's how he has at least kept, if not increased, the fortune he inherited.

His entire adult life is a story of payments to people, usually workers and contractors that did work on "his" buildings, being avoided.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

To be fair, it's getting difficult to keep track of his trials.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Use your imagination.

Please no

[–] Theprogressivist 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

He's afraid of his small ass dick being discussed in a court of law.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And maybe discussion of it being nonconsensual

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

If i recall correctly, she said they had been flirty at some point, and she basically came into a room after he had suddenly stripped naked and she was basically like "well, might as well."

So not forced, but definitely not enthusiastic.