this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
303 points (98.7% liked)

United States | News & Politics

6936 readers
743 users here now

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Body-worn camera footage of the January 25 incident in Gresham was released by the Civilian Office of Police Accountability today.


A Chicago Police officer responding to a ShotSpotter alert fired shots at a child who was playing with fireworks—that’s the conclusion from the Civilian Office of Police Accountability in a statement released today.

“COPA can confirm that a firearm was not used against the officers,” said COPA First Deputy Chief Administrator, Ephraim Eaddy.

CPD initially identified the child as a man, claiming he had opened fire first.

They also reported seeing “flashes of light.”

“When officers arrived in the area, they observed an individual, who has now been identified as a juvenile, standing near a residence. As one officer exited the vehicle, they heard a loud bang, which was later determined to be fireworks. The officer who exited the vehicle discharged their firearm in the direction of the juvenile, who was not struck by gunfire,” investigators state in the press release about the incident.

Body-worn camera footage from the three officers responding to the ShotSpotter alert appears to show one officer immediately fire his gun after hearing a loud bang.

He then yells, “Shots fired! Shots fired!” as another officer radios in a “10-1,” indicating officers are in need of urgent assistance.

read more: https://jinxpress.org/no-its-just-fireworks-chicago-cop-opens-fire-on-child-with-fireworks-after-shotspotter-gunshot-alert/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 101 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

Doesn't help that being a cop unironically requires less training then the vast majority of other jobs. You would think giving someone a gun to point at people, who they're largely supposed to "protect" would require at least a few years of training.

[–] rifugee 54 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Notably, a cosmetologist requires 2-3 times more training than police officers in the US. The only two countries with lower training requirements are Iraq and Afghanistan. Stories like this post, the acorn incident, and shooting into that ladies house, start to make a lot more sense with that context, eh?

[–] shalafi 20 points 4 months ago

I have a take on the cosmetologist thing! Sounds silly for a hair cutting job, doesn't it?

Dated a woman who trained cosmetologists at the local college. Gods she was educated.

Thinking out loud one night I said, "Ugh. What's it called when a chemical reaction... uh... opposite of exothermic?"

"Endothermic."

"How the hell you know that?!"

Turns out when you fuck with people's bodies, you have to know some shit. Forgot the topic, but I had asked her how she knew another odd thing.

"Because old people may have nails (whatever, I forgot), and you have to recognize that as a sign of (whatever, I forgot). You cannot use $chemical on them."

Anyway, off topic, but there are reasons cosmetologists are trained and certified. They're certainly more educated than most cops.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 42 points 4 months ago

unironically requires less training then the vast majority of other jobs.

To elaborate further, it requires less, as in police forces have won lawsuits to specifically hire under-qualified applicants. It's not just a quirk of a unstructured administration - it is their goal.

[–] Anticorp 12 points 4 months ago

They're there to protect the system, not the people.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I had the idea (source: fictional TV) that ALL cops had to be trained at a police academy before becoming cops. That’s not the case?

[–] grue 17 points 4 months ago

I mean yeah, they do, but police academies in real life are hardly the solemn and rigorous institutes of higher learning they're portrayed as in the Police Academy movies.

[–] shalafi 6 points 4 months ago

There are 18,000 police departments in the US. We can't talk about them as a monolithic entity.

There might be 2 local dudes, there might be 10,000, training varies wildly by city and state, let alone for federal officers.

I'd be down for some sort of federal minimum requirements, but now we're into sticky state's rights arguments. (And yes, like it or not, our states have wide latitude for self-governance. It's a big dammed country.)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Training is where they learn to shoot first ask questions later

[–] dumpsterlid 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yeah I am getting real tired of centrists acting like the training is the solution not the problem.

The “training” is an indoctrination into an ideological system designed to uphold racial and socio-economic disparities through the use of violent force and to act otherwise is to blatantly ignore the history of policing in the United States.

The cop fired at the acorn because he was an idiot and probably wasn’t well trained, but more importantly the cop fired on the acorn because inside his rotten little mind are vivid images of dangerous black men threatening him at every corner and he was sure like a child walking through the dark that the monster was justttt about to jump out at him. This kind of ideology is fundamental to police culture in the US, it cannot be corrected with retraining because it is a basic worldview and causes an incredible amount of violence towards innocent people.

ACAB

[–] FireTower 3 points 4 months ago

That is the case. For full time police officers typically it'll be something like half a year in an academy followed by another half a year on the job with a field training officer.

[–] Naja_Kaouthia 3 points 4 months ago

Hell I’m just some dumbass trainer and I’ve had to go through continuing training myself for almost 4 years now and all I do is talk to people all day and teach them how to use tools like a ticketing system.