this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
883 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

59578 readers
6091 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kelargo 33 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Use POE Ethernet. Problem solved.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Any recommendations for PoE cameras?

[–] LukyJay 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I use hikvision and the quality is great in low light. I haven't connected them to the internet since I use Frigate and Home Assistant to monitor the feeds.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

I put mine on an unconnected network attached to a connected desktop. Videos are written and uploaded to the cloud when motion is detected. ISpy is a good open source video system even if it is written in C#.

[–] Ydna 1 points 9 months ago

Check out Reolink, they have a lot of package systems and lots of deals. Watch some videos on the installation process.

[–] RubberElectrons 1 points 9 months ago

I've set family up with a lorex system, setup was pretty straightforward and it works well. No monthly subscription fees rock.

[–] modus 1 points 9 months ago

I've been happy with Hikvision recording to my Qnap NAS. I've heard some bad ethical things about their company, but the cam works well.

[–] Clipboards 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

UniFi Protect is outstanding. You need to buy one of their NVRs or cloud gateways to use it, but it's incredible & wouldn't want another system for our house/family business

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Didn't they accidentally send supposedly private video to the wrong users recently?

[–] Clipboards 4 points 9 months ago

Yes, there was an incident where ~1k people received push notifications that were intended for other accounts

Shitty, but they addressed the issue within 24hr, notified impacted users, and published a sitrep. They handled it extremely well imo, but also you could disable the cloud connection if it concerns you

https://community.ui.com/questions/Bug-Fix-Cloud-Access-Misconfiguration/fe8d4479-e187-4471-bf95-b2799183ceb7?ref=404media.co

[–] uis 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Clipboards 0 points 9 months ago

Yes. If that's not for you, that's fine! If that isn't a dealbreaker, it's an exceptional platform

[–] SpiceDealer 1 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Quick question: What advantages do PoE cameras have over offline CCTV cameras?

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They’re essentially the same, but you only need to run one wire to them instead of two. The PoE means you don’t need to worry about getting power to the camera, which historically has been one of the more expensive parts of installation; It usually means tying into existing electrical boxes if they’re nearby, or pulling new lines if they’re not. But with PoE, everything is on that one cable.

There’s also the advantage that a networked system can be controlled remotely. Things like pan/tilt/focus/etc can be remotely controlled via Ethernet. So if you have configuration options with the camera, you don’t need to physically access it with a ladder just to make those adjustments.

As for the actual video, it’s not much different; Everything lands at a centralized hub, which then records the video or streams it to a remote server, which then records it. There are advantages and disadvantages to either, and it’s typically advised to do both. Because with a local server, once a thief gets physical access to it, they can do whatever they want with it. You were relying on that video footage, but now it’s useless because the thief took all of your hard drives. With a remote system, the big disadvantage is that it’s reliant on your internet connection. So all a potential thief has to do is cut the line going into your house.

For a truly “secure” system, the general consensus is two local servers and a remote server. Have one local server accessible, in something obvious like a server rack. Then have another redundant server somewhere else, which is more hidden and more difficult to access. And put power backups on those local servers, so they can’t simply cut the power at your breaker panel. The hope is that even if they cut your internet and/or power, and destroy the first local server, you still have the second local server. This is notably easier to do with a PoE system, due to the aforementioned lack of power runs to the cameras. Just put your network on the power backup, and the cameras will continue to function even after the power is cut. But that’s hella expensive, and would typically be reserved for enthusiasts, paranoid apocalypse preppers, and/or rich people.

[–] SpiceDealer 2 points 9 months ago

Bookmarking this comment for future references. Thank you!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Easier and cheaper to install and maintain.

Only needs a single cable that can come from any PoE switch.

CCTV is just out-dated.

[–] uis 1 points 9 months ago

Digital. Can use regular computer as recorder.