this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
1649 points (96.4% liked)

Memes

45317 readers
1952 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If lemmy.world finds this, please tell my starving children that I love them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Soulg 17 points 8 months ago (4 children)

That's fine with me, I don't have any interest in "let's just kill a bunch of people" as an ideology. It's objectively wrong.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 8 months ago (3 children)

That's not the ideology though, guillotine memes are essentially just pushing for revolutionary restructuring of the state and economy. Nobody simply thinks "kill rich" and stops thinking there.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Nobody simply thinks "kill rich" and stops thinking there.

That's news to me, I always got the impression that "????" Was the next step after "kill rich"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

More accurately, revolutionary restructuring of society is the first step towards a better future.

[–] Daft_ish 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

If we boiled down any political ideology we could probably say they are all about, "let's just kill a bunch of people."

At least with revolution the barrel is pointed at the oppressor not the oppressed.

[–] Eldritch 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No, you couldn't. That largely goes against The ideology of actual libertarians, anarchists, and communists.

With the barrel of revolution, the oppressed are targeted frequently. Revolution is brutal, indiscriminate. And most importantly, temporary.

[–] Daft_ish 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

If I wanted to be a dick I could.

Which is the exact mindset that has us in arms against billionaires.

[–] Eldritch 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

So could anyone. But what does that have to do with anything?

Your edit isn't making anything any clearer. I'm all for eliminating millionaires and billionaires. In the sense of eliminating the concept. Not the people.

[–] Daft_ish 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's exactly how this conversation started. Revolution isn't about indiscriminate killing.

[–] Eldritch 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No one said they were. You are arguing a straw man. I simply said that they are indiscriminate. The French revolution sent 23 children to the guillotine. Many more dying imprisoned. Russia sent millions to the gulags to die for simple dissent. Not to mention revolutionaries killing tzar Nicholas's entire family. Including his young daughter, Anastasia.

They always start out by targeting specific things. But it always gets out of hand. Targeting many more people in the end than is necessary or deserving. When you rule by revolution. You never have peace. Always watching your back waiting for the revolution to unseat you. Your enemy list constantly growing.

[–] Daft_ish 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Whoa whoa whoa, I have no interest in arguing with you, buddy. This was the OP

That’s fine with me, I don’t have any interest in “let’s just kill a bunch of people” as an ideology. It’s objectively wrong.

Colloquially eat the rich or gulliotines are terms for revolution. The ideology behind revolution isn't "let's just kill a bunch of people."

It's "the ballot or the bullet" and like it or not the US was founded on it.

[–] Eldritch 1 points 8 months ago

I'm all for restructuring of the state and economy. But when has revolution ever truly worked long term. Has it worked long-term in France? Definitely in the short-term it made some change. Did it work long term in Russia? North Korea, etc. Replacing one inflexible authority with another is only asking to repeat their mistakes.

When the argument for an ideology as it has for so many of them, boils down to "you will accept it under penalty of death". It might be that it's a bad ideology.

I'm with Marx, it should be an evolution. Not revolution. Leftists giggling over guillotine posting isn't helpful. Because it was an all too real thing, for good or bad. Realistically it makes more enemies than it could ever remove.

[–] Son_of_dad 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

Believe it or not, they are. Only humans are capable of such cruelty.

[–] Daft_ish 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This is silly. Billionaires are people, otherwise guillotines wouldn't be effective.

[–] Gabu 2 points 8 months ago

Right, a society of machines would never create something as vile, insidious and wasteful as a billionaire

[–] harmsy 3 points 8 months ago

In this case it would be self-defense. The only reason anyone thinks otherwise is because the danger posed by a billionaire money hoarder is far more abstract than what most people are accustomed to.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The guillotines aren't necessary if the rich would strive for a better society.

The thing is that they would never agree to that, so then we need the guillotine.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

The path to a better society is elimination of Capitalism, so Capitalists aren't really going to agree to that, no matter how nice it would make things.