this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
244 points (98.0% liked)

World News

39386 readers
2864 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Japanese man has been sentenced to death for an arson attack at a Kyoto animation studio in 2019 which killed 36 people and injured dozens more.

The incident, one of Japan's deadliest in recent decades, killed mostly young artists and shocked the anime world.

Shinji Aoba, 45, pleaded guilty to the attack but his lawyers had sought a lighter sentence on grounds of "mental incompetence".

Judges rejected this however, ruling that Aoba knew what he was doing.

"I have determined that the defendant was not mentally insane or weak at the time of the crime," Chief Judge Masuda said on Thursday at Kyoto District Court.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Viking_Hippie 17 points 11 months ago (2 children)

To be fair, it's quite generous to call a political system based on a 1700s document "modern"..

[–] Scrongle 1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

That's a peculiar statement, considering the U.S. is essentially the most recent major nation (and one of very few) to be formed and grown, about as far from the intense pressures of previously established cultural or governmental influences (both from within, or from surrounding territories) as you can get, without leaving the planet.

...If that's not considered relatively modern when compared to the rest of the world, what is?

[–] Viking_Hippie 8 points 11 months ago

the U.S. is essentially the most recent major nation

Which isn't saying much at all since all other major nations are at least a thousand years old.

What IS saying a lot, though, is that the US constitution is the oldest national constitution still in effect bar none.

about as far from the intense pressures of previously established cultural or governmental influences (both from within, or from surrounding territories) as you can get, without leaving the planet.

Bullshit. The US is profoundly influenced by Christian norms and traditions for better and especially for worse. It's one of the most conservative countries in the West both politically and culturally.

If that's not considered relatively modern when compared to the rest of the world, what is?

Scandinavia, for example 🤷

[–] yesman 7 points 11 months ago

That's a particular statement, considering the US has the oldest democratic constitution in the world.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

South America and Africa are extremely confused right now...

Also, if you don't want to look that far abroad look at literally either of America's neighbors. Canada didn't finish growing in size until 1949 and formed a province as recently as 1999. Mexico has technically been a continuous nation since 1810 but it's worn a lot of different costumes in that time, including being ruled by a Habsburg.

[–] Feathercrown 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

In terms of countries it absolutely is

[–] Viking_Hippie 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Is it really, though?

Most modern countries don't consider dissent terrorism, most modern countries don't have mass shootings every week if not every day and in most countries, the color of your skin doesn't determine whether you're likely to survive a traffic stop.

[–] Feathercrown 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"Modern" doesn't mean "something I like", it means it was created recently. So yes, it really is modern.

[–] Viking_Hippie -3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No, it means that it functions in modern ways. The US constitution is the oldest one in the world still in use and US politics and culture are both heavily influenced by bronze age myths aka Abrahamic religion.

"Modern" doesn't mean "something I like"

That's probably the most ridiculous strawman I've seen in 2024, well done!

[–] Feathercrown 1 points 11 months ago

We have a long way to go in 2024 haha... and sorry, but you didn't refute it being modern, you simply listed things about it that you didn't like, and called those not being modern. That wasn't a strawman, I was literally just responding to what you said. If your beliefs are different then you should have chosen your words more carefully. This response is a great step up because it actually asserts something about the age of the constitution and its beliefs.

And that assertion is actually correct-- the US is over 200 years old when the rest of the existing democracies are mostly around 50. That's still a short timescale when we're talking about nations, but when referring to democracies in particular... yeah, it could use some updating.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Atlanta isn't a country, which ones are you talking about?

[–] Viking_Hippie 1 points 11 months ago