this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
336 points (93.8% liked)

Steam

3121 readers
3 users here now

Steam is a video game digital distribution service by Valve.

Steam News | Steam Beta Client news

Useful tools:
SteamDB
SteamCharts
Issue tracker for Linux version of Steam

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jarredpickles87 109 points 11 months ago (16 children)

Is this game really that good or is it just massively overhyped? I watched a videogamedunkey video about it, and I know he overly satirizes things for humor, but it just didn't look all that great.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 11 months ago (3 children)

It's a very specific type of game. If you don't like Rust, Ark, Raft, or any of those games like it Palworld probably isn't for you. At least not until mods come out.

[–] SkyezOpen 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'd put rust aside from other survival crafters because the challenge is pvp. Actually surviving alone in rust is easy and even boring. Though I also haven't played palworld multiplayer yet, but you definitely shouldn't jump into MP to start a game like this.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Palworld's multiplayer is more cooperatively focused, not PvP focused like Ark and Rust. It's fine to jump into MP on day 1.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

Idk I don’t like Rust or Ark but I’m totally hooked to Palworld

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

I brought great shame to my family with the mods I installed in the future. Shame so embarrassing that it breaks causality.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Survival crafting games have always been extemely bare minimum effort by most studios. Look how well Ark did despite it being buggy garbage with dlcs. Palworld has almost everything you'd want from a survival crafting game and is 10x more polished than its competition. Dunkey highlights the bugs, which are definitely there, but for day 1 it is actually very well done and includes a lot of polish and QoL features that I would normally expect an early access game to add months after launch. I don't know if he made a video from day 1 of ark or rust but it would be orders of magnitude worse than this. Also keep in mind this is the opposite of the type of game he usually plays.

Besides all that, it's multiplayer and the core gameplay is simply fun.

[–] rf_ 36 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It’s a very fun, silly, well-made game with a very addictive loop where you’re given a lot of small, easily achievable tasks that have you going: “one more and I’m done”.

On Sunday I played for 13 hours. I don’t know if they have a team of psychologists that found out how to make the game addictive, but the results speak for themselves.

It’s a fun and beautiful place to explore, full of vibrant colors and cute pals. Your base building is not boring because the boring resource gathering is automated by your pal slaves. It scratches optimization itches, and you also get raided which can result in hilarious outcomes that give you an opportunity to rebuild and organize your base more efficiently.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's a survival crafting game. It's functional, but yeah, I think overhyped. Most people play for the novelty, and that covers for the boring gameplay.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago (2 children)

That's overly reductive. I don't play it like a crafting game, I play it like a pokemon game and I'm having fun catching new pals while barely touching the base building.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You can do the same thing in Ark, that doesn't change what it is lol

[–] Sweetpeaches69 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ark is worse than Palworld, even just in terms of polish.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I'm having fun catching new pals while barely touching the base building.

/

people play for the novelty, and that covers for the boring gameplay.

Same difference

[–] Renacles 13 points 11 months ago

It's really good in a "this has no business being good" kind of way, I really like it.

[–] Wilzax 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's incredible for early access and will be the game of the decade if the devs continue to polish and refine it. And if it doesn't get sued for its similarities to Nintendo IPs, which I doubt will happen but is still possible.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago

It's a game that should be terrible but is actually fun as hell.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It hits the sweet spot in different areas. You can tell it’s a bunch of ideas from other games stitched together. Its Ark but more accessible, with pokemon flavor, elden ring’s tough enemy in the newbie area, deep rock galactic pick your friend up off the ground, automation lightly inspired by factio. If you look closely it’s got dark humour in all of the Pal descriptions. It’s just broadly appealing and enjoyable If you don’t take things too seriously, or if you can find the humour in the fact that everything is extremely familiar and just slightly altered to avoid being sued into extinction. If you read the developer interview it’s pretty funny too, new daily flash drives as version control, he couldn’t get hired at a big studio and was super surprised that steam would let Just anyone publish anything. It feels like it shouldn’t exist

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm also curious.

Everything about it looks like it copied a bunch of elements from other games and just seems very mediocre.

Not sure why people are so hyped about it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

yeah it seems like Genshin Impact copied Breath of the Wild, and Palworld copied Genshin Impact, and added Ark Survival Evolved (which copied Pokemon and Don't Starve), and Valheim (which copied Minecraft and Fortnight)

(just speaking generally here, please don't do a deep dive into how accurately these examples align)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

I think it's overhyped, but it's not as if there's nothing good there.

It's goofy, it's got those building and travel mechanics people like from other games, you can capture a cute/funny team of animals that people love from pokemon, it's a good stream game with multiplayer which means lots of free publicity

I think it could be way better than it is, but it's easy to see how it got to where it is.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

It's overhyped, but it is a fairly good Breath of the Wild mixed with Pokémon with light survival game elements and base building. It's nothing particularly new or special, but it is pretty good at being what it is, which is a weird combination of a bunch of existing things.

It's not game of the year or anything, but it's fine. I got bored after a while because there's no real challenge to the game. It needs to have something pushing you to progress, and that really isn't there at the moment.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Good is subjective. I don't think I would like the game very much now, but me ten years ago probably would have put thousands of hours into it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Its enjoyable and I think it struck a right mixture of things got get popular

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

It's good for a $30 survival game.

Huge world map to explore, a variety of different monsters to capture, bosses to work up to, automation that allows the more annoying parts of survival games to happen in the background as you explore, space to fiddle with the monster capture stuff through breeding and condensing.

A lot of people I know enjoy it for the shock value of pokemon-with-guns that you put into a sweatshop and then butcher, but you don't have to do it that way and it can just be a not-pokemon game where your gardevoir helps you craft stuff.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I've been enjoying it. I'm midway through the game right now and I will admit the mechanics are getting rather repetitive and I feel like I've seen most of what it has to offer, other than new technologies to unlock at higher levels.

If the devs add some more content for the leveling and endgame stages of the game, I would say it absolutely lives up to the hype. It's still early access so anything is possible, but I know better than to get my hopes up