this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
589 points (97.4% liked)

politics

19105 readers
4920 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Former President Trump’s legal team suggested Tuesday that even a president directing SEAL Team Six to kill a political opponent would be an action barred from prosecution given a former executive’s broad immunity to criminal prosecution.

The hypothetical was presented to Trump attorney John Sauer who answered with a “qualified yes” that a former president would be immune from prosecution on that matter or even on selling pardons.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid 71 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Okay, Joe. You know what to do.

[–] medicsofanarchy 14 points 10 months ago

Biden: If the Supreme Court agrees, take the shot.

[–] Diplomjodler3 9 points 10 months ago

He's known for a long time. But corporate Democrats only play hardball against progressives.

[–] pregnantwithrage -5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

This is a fucking wild comment. I couldn't have imagined this being the discourse we have as politically acceptable on either side. We are low-key driving off the cliff and going into civil war territory and I'm seeing it everywhere.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Live by the sword, die by the sword.

If you have a problem with this situation--and you should--then your argument is with the GOP and their reckless sword waving.

[–] FlyingSquid 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Do you really think I was serious when I suggested that Joe Biden go kill Trump? What's he going to do, talk him to death?

[–] pregnantwithrage -4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Don't know but I can't recall a time where I was commenting online that I wanted someone to be assassinated. It's just weird to joke about but it's just so common now.

[–] FlyingSquid 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Then you don't remember the Obama years very well.

Also, maybe if Trump's lawyers didn't say a president could assassinate people, I wouldn't have joked about it.

[–] pregnantwithrage -5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

That's a poor reason to excuse joking about killing someone but it's so common now your excused I guess.

[–] FlyingSquid 3 points 10 months ago

Oh for god's sake, lighten up. People have told dark jokes for literally centuries.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

A political party's front-runner's lawyers are discussing the legality of a sitting president killing dissenters on US soil.

This is a perfectly fucking valid reason to make that joke.

Get over yourself.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

I cannot imagine clutching pearls this hard over a joke about assassinating somebody who themselves is responsible for thousands or more deaths. The lives of killers are so precious they're above even jokes.