this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
60 points (88.5% liked)

politics

19146 readers
3067 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

One administration official said the speech’s importance is not lost on the president’s top advisers — and the president himself.

Advisers grappling with President Joe Biden’s stubbornly low poll numbers and pressure from Democrats to shake up his strategy are planning a far more aggressive approach in coming weeks, with a keen focus on what they see as a high-stakes opportunity and hurdle to clear: the State of the Union address.

One administration official said the speech’s importance is not lost on the president’s top advisers — and the president himself.

“This is probably going to be the most important speech of his presidency and it’s going to set the tone for [this] year,” another administration official said.

The White House is trying to fend off Democratic anxiety about how the incumbent president enters the election year — virtually tied with former President Donald Trump in national polls.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

He's literally the best president we've had in the past 40 years. I'm sorry you don't like him, but he's taken a deeply divided nation and managed to push through some of the most progressive reforms in my lifetime.

He's done far more with far less than any President in my lifetime. You may have to go back to Lincoln before you find a similar political landscape.

All the major union successes are possible because of his support. The funding for green initiatives in the US is literally the largest that's ever pushed through anywhere.

He took control of the most mismanaged government in history at the height of a pandemic against a split Congress that would as soon spit in his face rather than give him a win. The supreme court is obviously partisan and eager to undo everything he's accomplishing, but somehow he keeps making progress.

Yeah, he's done some really stupid stuff, especially his support of Israel in the face of Palestinian genocide. He's not perfect and I want him held accountable for that stuff as well.

That said, I genuinely think history will look very kindly upon him, should our country not completely self-destruct. He has managed one of the most challenging climates a president can face and has pulled off genuinely historic wins. He's a consummate politician in the best way possible.

[–] distantsounds 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

He’s literally the best president we’ve had in the past 40 years.

..and that’s when I stopped reading.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

In all seriousness, who's better? I think the only serious contender is Obama, who doubtless accomplished a lot of important things, but also had a lot of political naivete and struggled to navigate a similarly divided Congress.

Clinton runs a distant third, but had a solid economical and political landscape and basically didn't mess anything up too badly. I guess H. W. Bush would be fourth, but his single term made it clear he was anything other than dynamic or compelling even at the time. W. Bush was downright devastating for our political and economic standing. Reagan is basically why we are where we are today. He still enjoys too much goodwill for how disastrous he was for the US.

[–] distantsounds 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Obama 100% it ain’t even close, Jack.

He met the moment. I have plenty of gripes (ie not prog enough), but he was a solid leader for the country. Ironically, I think much of this MAGA shit is fallout from having a competent black man as president. AND he wanted to give you healthcare?! Half the country’s brains exploded trying to figure out how free healthcare could be a bad thing

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I think that's a really fair argument to make. I agree that having a black man in office drove half the country insane. I think Obama was a great communicator, inspirational figure and his healthcare reforms were deeply important.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago
[–] StraySojourner 3 points 10 months ago

I love how comments like yours, refuting comments like theirs, never seem to have a response. Good write up, thank you.