this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
254 points (97.0% liked)

News

23261 readers
3926 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The justices will review a decision by the Colorado Supreme Court that said Trump could be barred from the Republican primary ballot in that state, but the U.S. Supreme Court ruling is likely to have national repercussions, potentially setting guidelines that would determine how every other state would handle the issue.

The brief order said the case would be argued on an accelerated schedule on Feb. 8, indicating that a ruling will follow soon after.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lettruthout 101 points 10 months ago (9 children)

"There is also the possibility that if Trump is kicked off the ballot, Republicans could take retaliatory action by doing the same to President Joe Biden. Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick has already floated such a move."

I wonder that excuse they'll dream up to try to pull this off.

[–] Thteven 56 points 10 months ago

They're not expecting to actually pull it off, it's just posturing for their dumbfuck base.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Those far rights can't care less about reasons.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

That’s one of the reasons they love religion. All you gotta do is claim that the other side is EVIL. No logic, proof, or accountability necessary.

[–] Evilcoleslaw 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The one I've heard floated is not securing the border to their satisfaction somehow constitutes insurrection and since a lot of people have argued there doesn't have to be any conviction or factual determination by a court it would stick just as well as the Jan 6th stuff against Trump.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

That just means every member of congress is an insurrectionist because they have just as much or more power to change that.

It is not insurrection in either todays definition or the 14ths contemporary definition, and that would be slapped down.

[–] brightandshinyobject 9 points 10 months ago

A brand new congress? I could get behind that.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

Republicans leafing through The Sovereign Citizen's Guide to Vexatious Litigation for ideas as we speak

[–] Bdtrngl 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Hunter's laptop, Hillary's emails and Obama's tan suit.

[–] Rusticus 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Buttery males with freeze peaches

[–] afraid_of_zombies 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If we enforce the law it might be enforced badly. Is a pretty bad argument.

[–] Seasoned_Greetings 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's a bad argument to consider not enforcing the law, but it's not an incorrect statement. Republicans responded to the impeachment of Trump by continously trying to impeach Biden. They're responding to the insurrection by pointing at things dems do and yelling insurrection.

It's dumb and incorrect, but it's pretty effective at diluting the seriousness of those particular actions to their own voter base. You could argue that that's the point.

[–] afraid_of_zombies 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And how is their trying going? Did they pull it off yet? They control the house and have such for nearly two years.

It’s dumb and incorrect, but it’s pretty effective at diluting the seriousness of those particular actions to their own voter base. You could argue that that’s the point.

Citation needed. I want you to show that polling has gone up for them as a result of their lackluster efforts.

[–] Seasoned_Greetings 3 points 10 months ago

I don't need to show you statistics to shed light on their intent. It's not hard to figure out what they're doing. It's also not hard to see that what they're doing is damage control. The result of that would be keeping their polls from going down, not making them go up. You can't prove a negative, so I don't know what you want me to do.

As far as diluting the seriousness of what they've done, go turn on fox news. They blast Biden's "insurrection" and impeachment "proceedings" 24/7. Do you need more proof than that?

Lastly, if you're trying to defend your original statement, you're preaching to the choir here. You don't have to be an asshole about it. It's a bit asinine to assert that they aren't doing it with intent.

[–] rivermonster 3 points 10 months ago

Nobody wants Texassistan in the union, not even Texass. Heh.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

The only thing I have heard is that anyone who supported the BLM movement during the rioting is essentially supporting anti american values thus insurrection. I have heard this from a few separate places.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Trump being disqualified from running in Colorado and Biden being disqualified from running in Texas are not equally important in the election.