this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
874 points (94.3% liked)

Gaming

3239 readers
10 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.


2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.


I should not need to explain this one.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.


Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.



Logo uses joystick by liftarn

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MajorHavoc 69 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

There's a lot of gamers in this thread too young to remember how overloaded and miserable the free console game servers were.

Microsoft was like "chuck us like ~$5 per month and we will put up enough servers so the games are actually playable". At the time, it was the best deal available for console gaming.

Honestly an argument could be made it was the most economical way to play online, in general, at the time. The console cost was subsidized, and the online servers were arguably at-cost, and you really only needed to buy one copy of Halo to join the fun.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Yeah but they don't run the servers anymore. So I don't know what I'm paying for really.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Some (Nintendo) even like using P2P instead of dedicated servers. Which makes it even crazier to pay for online.

When I pay for a game access to the whole game should be included and it is on PC (don't bring up DLCs and all that).

[–] M137 1 points 11 months ago

There are more costs than just servers. I'm just saying, that doesn't mean it shouldn't be part of the upfront price of the game, though, and I agree with you.

[–] AnUnusualRelic 1 points 11 months ago

Access to a router somewhere, apparently.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Idk. I was always a PC gamer, and think the old, often modded, independently run servers were much more fun than the soul-less matchmaking I see on most modern games. It was fun to play UT2004, and join a server where the arena was someone's bedroom and all the sound effects were ripped from The Simpsons; or to jump into a clan's open server and shit-talk them while they dominate me, or to join a server run by Beyond Unreal's community, where the mods used were voted on by the community beforehand, IIRC. Good times.

[–] MajorHavoc 5 points 11 months ago

I was always a PC gamer, and think the old, often modded, independently run servers were much more fun than the soul-less matchmaking I see on most modern games.

Absolutely. If one was lucky enough to have a buddy with a server setup, that was by far the coolest option.

[–] Katana314 1 points 11 months ago

There's still yet another side to it. Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory is still around today. Boot it up, and try joining a game. Five hours later, the mods finish loading, and you get a splash screen full of ads before you begin playing with bots.

At the time, it felt like there were a lot of hobbyists willing to shell out cash to run their servers, but ensuring you got a fair game low on mods was often more trouble than it was worth. I'm even a little bit grateful that Team Fortress 2 started hosting their own, even if they failed to fix the bot situations.

[–] Gunrigger 1 points 11 months ago

Very true. These things do still exist for a lot of games. It lost popularity a lot on CS due to the incessant need for "competitive" matchmaking, but they are still out there. Rust is a good game for heavily modded servers (if you like the game concept in the first place) and I think Arma (which a bit more niche) is basically all community servers, ranging from in depth military reality to role playing much more mundane stuff.

[–] Gunrigger 1 points 11 months ago

And this is why it was successful and still exists to this day.

excuse the fist shaking at the cloud

Kids these days literally want everything for free and don't care that microtransactions and other monetization has pervaded every aspect of games.

Horse armour, man. Never forget the horse armour. Kids these days love horse armour.

[–] hark 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's not a matter of age. You can play for free on PC now and it's a better experience in many regards. There are also older games (even on console) where you could connect directly to a user through IP address or phone number and those will work to this day. Consoles are the domain of companies that want to have their little walled garden so they can overcharge for things like this.

[–] MajorHavoc 2 points 11 months ago

It's totally a matter of age. Kids these days have no idea how good they have it, and don't realize they need to get off my lawn. Shakes cain in the air /s