this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
634 points (92.6% liked)

Political Memes

4617 readers
3154 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lauchs 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Here's a list of projects from just my province.

https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/environment/climate-change/public-sector/offset-portfolio

They include implementing new technologies which would otherwise not be cost effective for companies, upgrading older technologies before their phase out date or just interesting projects like diverting methane from landfills to be used as natural gas.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So basically they get to pollute as much as they want so long as they pay, rather than just forcing them to implement these "non cost effective solutions"

Im sure the money goes to good things but it just seems like an inefficient solution. We should be punishing companies for their pollution, not encouraging them to pollute as much as they want so long as they pay their dues

[–] Lauchs -1 points 6 months ago

I strongly recommend reading about carbon taxes. They're pretty much unanimously supported in the scientific community as how to develop and implement the tech we need to get through to a zero emissions world.

Carbon offsets are as close as we currently have to such a plan right now. While imperfect, they are a start in the right direction and are already helping to fund the projects we need to fund.

Ironically, these schemes are some of the most efficient. By putting a price on carbon, we allow all corners of the free market to innovate and find solutions.

Government can't just snap its fingers and create new carbon sequestration technology. Nor is it the best positioned to assess which new technologies are going to be the right fit for which job. (Unless you want to vastly expand and fund the civil service.)

If some company is willing to fund the green revolution, have at it. Unless you have a scheme to convince everyone to stop eating beef, flying and driving, putting a price on carbon is generally the agreed upon best solution.