this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
381 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19235 readers
3150 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] YoBuckStopsHere 46 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Probably because it's MAGA that most needs to be watched.

[–] NightAuthor 49 points 1 year ago (3 children)

No… no no no to this type of rhetoric. If law enforcement wants to spy on an American, they should be required to prove to a judge they have a very good reason and get a warrant for that shit.

[–] YoBuckStopsHere 17 points 1 year ago

Agreed, but this is why MAGA is upset.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well, okay, but we're gonna create our own set of secret judges so nobody can keep an eye on what we're doing. This is about us being able to watch you, not the other way around. --the intelligence agencies

[–] SinningStromgald 2 points 1 year ago

And we won't actually LOOK at anything, with our eyes, until we need to but we will collect EVERYTHING on EVERYONE...ALL THE TIME. But since we aren't "looking" it's not spying. - also intelligence agencies

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And this is why security and privacy practices are so important. It's not important until it is.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I agree, but that changes nothing about why maga is upset, and I'm quite sure concern that their plans for a Republican dictatorship might be further threatened is a big component of why.

[–] billiam0202 23 points 1 year ago

Can't imagine why they'd be mad about the FBI spying on self-admitted domestic terrorists.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Until MAGA isn't the one. Until it's somebody else, like a pro-Palestinian group or a gun control group.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

this isn't for MAGA. MAGA leaves a trail of probable cause all over the internet. they livestream themselves kicking in doors at the capitol and bear spraying cops. this is for spying on normal people who've done nothing wrong but inconvenience the ruling class in some way or another.

[–] Ensign_Crab 1 points 1 year ago

As though law enforcement will use this against their MAGA drinking buddies.

This will be used for drug enforcement. When it fails to do what they're claiming it will right now, they'll say that they need greater power to violate everyone's rights. And then use it for drug enforcement.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago