this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2023
8 points (83.3% liked)

3DPrinting

15791 readers
329 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or [email protected]

There are CAD communities available at: [email protected] or [email protected]

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
8
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Sticky to c/3dprinting
 

Curious if I can get a sanity check off my problem diagnosis (or alternate theories!)

I tried a long print today and wound up with a 1/2 inch layer shift on the x-axis near the end of a long print, taller than most I've done, not certainly not the tallest.

It occured on a spool I just opened a few days ago and printed two other ~250g pieces with. I'm very certain that I never lost control of the filament end. My spool in mounted using the stock ender 3 mount on the left side is the gantry and a filament guide arm.

After reading a bit, I'm thinking this was due to the filament on the spool loosening up from a large travel and then binding on itself. Seems the easiest way to fix this might just be to put more space between the spool and the printer so the slack can absorb the shifting without pushing back on the spool and loosening several turns off filament.

I don't think it's heat or any general axis binding as the shift only happened at a single layer, at a hight that I've been able to print through before, and the motion generally appears smooth when I exercise it.

So... Experimentation will probably prove me right or wrong, but before I sink another day of print time... Does that sound reasonable or am I missing a common problem?

Edit: Solved, see comment by @[email protected] for the actual problem. Many thanks to all who provided their thoughts!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Just to add an additional thing to check: are you sure the model maintained its position on the layer the entire time, right?

[–] Sticky 1 points 2 years ago

You mean is the later shift consistent? I.e. a constant offset rather than skew? I think that is the case, yes.