this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
535 points (98.4% liked)

World News

39350 readers
3692 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

If it was for me i would abolish Inheritance entirely. The problem is i cannot imagine a non-dictatorial type of system that could make it work. You would have to make presents illegal, and other things like this. If anybody knows a solution please let me know and they got my vote
edit: a letter

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think a scaling inheritance tax that accounts for all assets could work

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Company ownership would be wacky after a founder dies since now the government would own most of the company. If the government sells off their shares, the companies value would crash and random other people could get control. So the government would probably need to keep the ownership for a long time at least. Which I guess is one way to nationalize companies.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Better idea: family-owned companies, upon death of the owner, get turned into a coop owned by all the employees of the company, each getting 1 share.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That sounds like a good way to have huge companies with one employee and thousands of contractors. But might be good if you can make it bulletproof.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That just sounds like you need more enforcement against fake subcontracting.

[–] interceder270 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think inheritance should be illegal, but there should be a wealth cap.

[–] assassin_aragorn 2 points 1 year ago

It's in generation 0's (original wealth holder) interest as well. Massive inheritance like that ruins upbringing. After a few generations your family line is reduced to Musk and Trump. Nobody wants that.