this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
201 points (96.3% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

2273 readers
686 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It released almost a ton of CO~2~.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yemmly 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I’m not a rocket surgeon, but can the emissions really weigh more than the fuel?

[–] Everythingispenguins 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Absolutely and that's how chemistry works, basically you take some hydrocarbons(a bunch of H and C) and you add oxygens to them. I know it is weird to think of burning this way because you see the thing burnt disappear but remember that mass cannot be created or destroyed. Burning is really just adding two masses together and getting some waste heat in the process. What is left over from the process is going to be the weight of both the mass and it takes a lot of oxygen to burn jet fuel. Hence why the missions weigh so much more than the jet fuel.

[–] yemmly 5 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the explanation

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I imagine it includes the extraction, processing and delivery of the fuel?

From a rudimentary chemistry understanding, changing a lighter hydrogen atom for a heavier oxygen atom (burning hydrocarbon -> H2O + CO2) will increase the mass. I dunno how applicable that is in the real world tho

[–] FooBarrington 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The atoms themselves aren't changing, you'd have to do fusion or fission for that. It's the molecules that are changing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I meant "swapping" a hydrogen atom for an oxygen atom within a molecule as part of the chemical reaction of combustion.
I didn't explain it well, tho