this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
1097 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

60021 readers
3299 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AngryCommieKender 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Miles per gallon energy? What's that abbreviation?

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Just another example of how Americans will use anything but metric (we do use metric sometimes, I know, it’s just a meme). We could easily measure it in Wh/km, but then we would also have to change how we measure gasoline cars if we want people to make direct comparisons. But, since we sell gas by the gallon, we would also have to change how gas is sold. When the EPA first came up with mpge I thought it was stupid (we don’t buy electricity by the gallon!), but I’ve come around to the convenience of being able to easily compare the two types of fuel. The EPA assumes 1 gallon of gas to contain 33.7 kWh of energy.

Maybe we should get everyone to switch to Joules for measuring, buying, and selling gasoline and electricity?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a pretty flawed comparison, though. It assumes a certain amount of fossil fuels being burned at the power plant that's feeding your electric car. That's a number that varies a lot between regions, and is bound to change as more and more renewables are spun up. Putting solar panels on your home throws the whole comparison out. It's nearly useless.

[–] turmacar 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Isn't the point for the consumer to measure their cost? Not the overall efficiency of the production and distribution for each source of fuel?

Like I buy X gallons per month of gas because my car gets 20 mpg and I dive Y miles. If this electric car uses Z amount of electricity and I still drive Y miles, I'll save ß dollars.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It is not really possible for the consumer to calculate their respective mpge, since your specific utlities power mix will differ region by region.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That's the idea, but it doesn't actually do that. Even if it did, the cost would be variable by region, so it's still imperfect.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

To be fair, even in metric countries in Europe, they use imperial occasionally. This is the case for wheel sizes and display sizes, both usually measured in inches.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Don't tell them. Once you start looking for exceptions to "use metric for everything", you'll find one in every country, and people get really angry when you point this out. As if not being 100% metric is some kind of moral failing.

Car tire sizing is a bizarre, design-by-committee thing, though. Diameter is in inches, width is in mm, and sidewall width is a percentage of the width. Why?

[–] assassin_aragorn 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're using kWh instead of Joules in your comment. :P

Joules represent a very small amount of energy. We probably want kWh or kJ. Although, I think just places in the US already use kWh for electricity?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's not complicated. Mpge allows you to compare energy efficiency vs internal combustion cars. They also provide kWh/100 mi, which allows you to calculate actual cost of operation, depending on how much you pay for a kWh.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The E is for Equivalent. It's how "fuel" efficiency is discussed when referring to non liquid fuel vehicles.

[–] AngryCommieKender 5 points 1 year ago

Gotcha, thanks.