this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
329 points (82.4% liked)

Political Memes

5497 readers
2320 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Hey now, don’t go lumping “eat the rich” in with these crazies. I can hate tankies and hate our growing wealth inequalities

[–] iAvicenna 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

eat the rich? I bet they would taste funny but I am open to the idea

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are thinking of clowns.

The rich have been fattened up for decades and massaged on a weekly basis. Their meat is juicy and tender.

[–] iAvicenna 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

They taste like infinite free healthcare so you know that meat is fucking Premium Kobe grade shit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

A rich diet is sectarian-agnostic on the left

[–] goldenlocks -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Communists are the only way to solve that wealth inequality

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

God that would be a depressing thought. Thankfully, a tankie’s idea of communism is in fact not the only solution, we need only look at democratic socialist countries like Denmark.

I think it’s fine for people to be rich. I don’t think it’s fine for that to be at the expense of the poor to such a ridiculous magnitude that the wealth has long become moot for that individual’s quality of life:

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

we need only look at democratic socialist countries like Denmark

Sure helps when Europe benefits from literally trillions of dollars a year in net extraction from the global south

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095937802200005X

[–] co209 4 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the sauce! The Nordic argument gets used far too often by center-leftists in the core imperial countries because they already assume a level of available wealth which can only be sustained by the exploitation of the colonized rest of the world.

The greed of the rich will never be sated. They may retreat or bide their time but they will come back for more, until they have sucked every drop of your blood.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just wanted to point out that Denmark is a Social Democracy, not Democratic Socialist. The vast majority of the economy is fully Capitalist, paying for Social Programs isn't Socialism, Worker Ownership of the Means of Production is.

If you want to argue for Social Democracy, go for it, but don't pretend it's actually Socialism.

[–] goldenlocks 2 points 1 year ago

Denmark

Only communists in the US are calling for nationalization of oil. About 75% of Denmark's oil is nationalized and lets them fund social programs. Liberals in the US would never accept that.