this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
339 points (94.3% liked)

politics

19241 readers
3004 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Not wrong. The crazy chick I dated in college was so much better in bed then the normal ones I went with since then. It honestly kind of ruined my expectations..

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Yep. They do that.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah.

Marry a nice catholic girl and keep a crazy one with tattoos and daddy issues on the side.

[–] i_simp_4_tedcruz 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok, so here's what happened, buddy. Crazy usually means reduced inhibitions. Reduced inhibitions= good in bed because you're not overthinking, you're just doing what feels awesome.

Then you go out with a girl that's not batshit insane and doesn't go from 0-100 with everyone they bang, right away. You're disappointed. Why does it feel like this normal girl isn't obsessed with my body immediately? Why is she holding back? It can't be you, so you attribute it to her being bad in bed rather than the obvious answer that she's learning you and isn't completely comfortable yet.

That kind of stuff comes with time. Unless you're batshit insane.

Tldr: you rushed it with the "normal girls" and you could probably spend some more time growing close to them before declaring them inferior in bed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I understand the problem. It doesn't change the fact that the girl that doesn't require a ton of effort to get to open up is objectively better in bed. Also I was with some of them that came afterwards for quite a while and things didn't improve all that much. If anything it got worse after the honeymoon phase was over.