this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
490 points (98.4% liked)

pics

19622 readers
226 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] setsneedtofeed 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Or any nation as far as sources I have list.

[–] Something_Complex 6 points 1 year ago

Apparently there is this uge differwncw about where you storage them. The only reason some portugues and British ships aren't the oldest sailing vessels is because we keep them in museums. Yhe but they are still in comission, sooo idk I guess we where both right depending how you frase it.

So, while the USS Constitution is the oldest naval vessel still afloat, the HMS Victory holds the record for the oldest naval vessel still in commission. Both ships are significant historical artifacts and serve as museum ships, commemorating important eras in naval history.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Although HMS victory is the oldest naval vessel in comission, she's got 3 decades on the old girl

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Something_Complex -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Do you realize the if they are in comission all that they need to do is put it on whater and then constitution stops being the oldest afloat.

So if I can take it's title that easy maybe it doesn't deserve it idk

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Victory would sink if put on the sea.
Over time, repairs have been carried out to maintain her appearance, but not her seaworthyness. In many places, soft wood has replaced hardwood and no effort has been made to ensure she is structurally sound or water tight.

[–] Something_Complex 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Bro wtf are you talking about, the USS constitution is towed by tugboats in it 1 yearly journey....it's little more then the victory tbh.

https://www.cnn.com/travel/article/massachusetts-uss-constitution/index.html

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Victory would likely sink in the dry dock before the tug could take her anywhere. There has been no effort made to make her float. Hull repairs done over the last few decades have not been made water tight.

[–] Madison420 3 points 1 year ago

It wouldn't constitution had never been dry docked as a matter of long term storage, victory hasn't seen water in a hundred years (April 8 1925) and no you cannot easily just drop her back in the water and expect her to float. That said constitution could sail today if it were advantageous to do so, last time she sailed in her own power was July 21 1997.