this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
1705 points (94.1% liked)

linuxmemes

20922 readers
1908 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 41 points 11 months ago (33 children)

Let's do it right here!
Sway is a Wayland i3 implementation and you really should be using Wayland instead of X.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I would love to but 1. I love my simple awesomeWM setup 2. Nvidia shenanigans.
:(

[–] CheesyFox 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Nvidia shenanigans

i know that feel bro :(

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] dabu 5 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] ObviouslyNotBanana 2 points 11 months ago

I might be swayed to try it out

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

The Sway implementation (not Wayland as some DEs seem to run really smoothly) sadly is still completely hit or miss depending on your exact hardware setup. I have two device (both even with nvidia grphics *sigh*) and one of them is just a buggy and flickering mess.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

I disagree. Sway is extremely high quality software. Nvidia is a known terrible player with FLOSS software. I hope they will continue their path of recent improvements.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sway devs don't support NVIDIA graphics

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I know they officially don't. And I didn't try to say that Sway was bad in any way or that it is their fault. I was just stating facts about state of it with NVIDIA graphics (that kept me -as a long-term i3 user- from switching to Wayland).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

No, you only should be using Wayland if you need some of it's features. If you don't need mixed refresh rate/mixed scaling you're fine using X.

[–] thedeadwalking4242 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

X is abandonware and full of security issues probably time to switch to maintained aoftware

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

This sentence works really well for twitter too

[–] [email protected] -3 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

X' architecture is insecure. There's no isolation between windows, and each process can spy on your input. That's just one example.
Wayland is necessary.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yet no known active exploits use this insecure architecture to cause actual harm. It's just another FUD.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

I'd hardly call that an exploit. There's no protection.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

For a while I would have agreed, and I used sway for years. But recently I switched back to i3 (i3-rounded) due to display issues with my AMD GPU. I started doing most of my development in the TTY, and found that switching from TTY to Wayland takes half a second and can sometimes break my GPU (until I switch between TTY and display a few times). With X11 it's instant and without issue ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. Hoping that gets fixed down the road, or that it's specific to my GPU.

load more comments (28 replies)