this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
1499 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19236 readers
3193 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Psychedelics need to be next. That step will take a bit, but it'll be awesome if that happens.

Colorado did good in setting the example, I believe. There wasn't a huge push to monetize it and the most common psychedelics were made fully legal to produce, use and give away.

In some ways, I don't really see mushrooms easily fitting into the dispensary model that we have here already. It's just a different kind of drug, s'all.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here in California my local smoke shop sells psilocybin infused chocolates under the table, but everyone knows about it and they're all branded and clean looking

It's legit a dream come true to pop by on the way home Friday for a trip on the weekend, and the idea that it's illegal disgusts me

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I read up on those, and (generally speaking, YMMV) the amount of active ingredient is ineffectively negligible, if there's any detectable at all. Not what I want to spend my money on.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A couple of the brands I'd agree with you on as I ate an entire bar of one type and felt nada, and another brand regularly felt much weaker.

However, as someone who grows their own as well, there are brands that aren't fucking around and will have you tripping hard on just a few pieces, and it's definitely psilocybin.

Smoke shop owner actively gets reviews from those of us who buy and has been filtering out the duds over time, it's been one of the most wholesome illegal drug experiences in my life tbh

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was right to qualify my statement, then! I can see where if you had a shop owner who was on their game, that would be a fantastic place to buy from. The vape store that sells Delta 9 and happens to have some rando shroom products, I'll pass on that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'll take my home grown gourmet shrooms over any chocolate bar that is sold under the counter.

While the common phrase is "a cube is a cube", I am finding that different mushrooms can have very distinct trip characteristics. (My Stormtroopers give me a really "fluffy" high and everything feels like a pillow, for example. It's weird, and I compare it to being inside a vagina. It's... a unique experience.)

Grinding up rando shrooms and shoveling that into a candy bar doesn't seem that appealing after having felt the nuances of different strains.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would also take your gourmet shrooms over any chocolate bar, for what it's worth

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

And I generally give them away, so it would even be a cheaper option.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If it's anything like the weed edibles market, steer clear unless you know who's making it.

Otherwise you're just going to be ripped off.

[–] Rootiest 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

In some ways, I don't really see mushrooms easily fitting into the dispensary model that we have here already.

In Massachusetts the dispensaries are giving out mushroom chocolates as "gifts" since they are decriminalized but not yet legal to "sell"

So at least in some states they are already being integrated into the dispensary market ahead of legalization.

From what I've seen you really need to eat the whole bar to get a legit trip but at least they are available to the general public. I suspect that given a little time (and actual legalization) there will be a wider variety of stronger products available.

They are likely playing it safe to avoid any mishaps that could damage their PR or their grey market psilocybin business

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I think psychedelics are interesting because their non-addictive nature doesn't cause competition for other drug companies.

There simply isn't a way to make egregious profits with them. Mushrooms are cheap and easy to grow. LSD, while being exceptionally hard to make, is effective in such small dosages it ends up being significantly cheaper than mushrooms.

I guess the biggest fear would be psychedelics causing people to 'wake up' to what they've been ignorant of. There's also the "I don't do it and so neither should anyone else crowd," but I don't think they're plentiful in Colorado.