56
this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
56 points (91.2% liked)
politics
19143 readers
3402 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Which makes me wonder why there isn't the same on other political groups. What did the right do that the left can't seem to match
The left tries to play by the rules, and the right either blatantly ignores them, or actively changes the rules to benefit their fascism.
What rules? Its like the left self impose rules and then get angry nobody else follows them. Like the driver going the speed limit in the fast lane mad that everyone is tail gaiting. I think the left use 'rules' as an excuse for having a real terrible social game. They have no organization or ability to communicate with common people, the status quo.
This is a really weird take. One group behaves in a brazenly illegal, unlawful, openly criminal and unethical manner… but it’s ethical, law-abiding folks who are the problem for behaving ethically and following the law?
What's illegal exactly? And isn't certain civil action also illegal at times justified. The problem is people and their behaviour. The left is clearly losing ground in all avenues and blame everyone and everything but themselves
You have the left and right confused there.
The right has abandoned any position of moral authority. Morality, to be absolutely clear, are the historically, and culturally, accepted rules for social behavior.
You want to be part of the group? You gots to be moral.
The right is only concerned with power, and that's it. Theyve given up on publishing positions on current issues. They have no solutions. They don't want to innovate, they want to change everything to a subscription service and extract as much wealth out as possible, all while legislating away any threatening start ups. They punch down, my guy. They punch down.
They believe in restricting freedom, restricting our rights to vote, our women's bodily autonomy, policies that put our collective social costs onto the shoulders of the lower and middle classes. They don't have a single policy that has broad public support, and they know it. Instead of adapting and using their 5th wing of government to bring their "base" up to speed with the times, theyve chosen subversion and court hostile foreign actors to attack their opposition. That's also known as sedition, btw.
They're out of touch corporate cocksuckers. Ted Cruz, pick any single one of them - not one has a single principle, spends all day fallatiating anyone with money. Metaphorically or not, a whores a whore, end of story.
Now I got no beef with whores, make yr money y'all. But I take umbrage with a whore trying to pass off as a slut. You ain't no non-profit. Motherfuckers need to come to Jesus, act right and be honest about shit. Jesus got down with the whores. Throwing his arm around Mary like, "yo, wanna break some bread, baby?" (Cuz she looked skinny, simmerdown folks).
Even a whore can be moral. If that is too mindbending for you to wrap your head around, or if you scoffed reading that, your worldview is myopic, and frankly, I would consider you sus and half expecting you to filter information to fit your world view, turn a blind eye to conflicting info, and by what's become a trope nowadays, more likely to double down than reevaluate the reality of your imaginary friend (or worldview). Not changing your mind based on new information - which is rooted in rationality/cause and effect, doesn't make you look principled, smart or confident. It makes you look like a scared toddler throwing a tantrum. It's immoral, it's shameful. And the rights fucking fantasy of realizing the Handmaid's Tale is, objectively, relinquishing our role as a global leader and a national security threat.
You cut funding to all education -> people get dumber -> we fall behind in tech -> your grandkids are gonna be learning Mandarin.
That's a guarantee. It takes 2° of foresight to work that out.
Now, if by left you mean the Democratic party, so, NOT the left at all. Dems are center-right. And Dems have the same problem with messaging that Republicans do. Neoliberalism (which both Dems and Reps are) don't have solutions to our problems. Neoliberalism doesn't invest in itself. It extracts money from the system and thinks the free market will fix our roads, keep our police from being infiltrated by the klan, and add all the trains we're gonna need to drop our carbon footprint. None of which neoliberalism has an answer for. Capitalism will not change anything. It does not innovate. It exploits and extracts.
It tells us we can have a red delicious apple or an off-season navel orange and calls that freedom. Then it calls your kid a commie for eating a mandarin and calls you a queer for eating an applepear.
That might be the best analogy I've ever given on neoliberalism.
Don't feed the troll
That rant was beautiful.
Thanks. I had fun with it. If nothing else, some catharsis ;)
Billionaire backers is a big one
You can push your narrative way further when truth is secondary.