politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Is there a similar list for democrat, or something that lists all related convictions for government officials? Something without the obvious bias or tit for tat
I'm not sure how complete these are (they are not under any wikiproject or have been correctly classified as lists) but wikipedia has some:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_federal_political_sex_scandals_in_the_United_States[List_of_federal_political_sex_scandals_in_the_United_States](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_federal_political_sex_scandals_in_the_United_States)
List_of_American_federal_politicians_convicted_of_crimes
Be the change you want to see in the world, bud - Make that list if you want it.
I can say that it will pale in comparison to the depravity and frequency you see here. It will also be full of stretches (e g. "a town councillor's neighbor's pizza delivery guy who I think was a Democrat!") and won't include a sitting US speaker of the house, literally third in line to the presidency. And all with anti-LGBTQIA, "save the children" political platforms by day while they are closeted gay themselves and rape children at night.
I think they're important to make it obvious the kind of people we have in power - for both parties
Of course, remove ALL corruption and evil, but there's only one party that consistently tries to hide it or pretend it was acceptable.
Yup. Biggest difference between the two parties is R's will staunchly defend their shitheads while D's want to purge them
Yep. Groomer Gaetz is still in office, while Al Franken stepped down for....well, for whatever it is that he supposedly did.
I've seen similar things said numerous times, but is there anything that indicates that the "people we have in power" are any more or less likely to commit sex crimes against children?
The rate compared to the general population may or may not be similar. What's important, though, is how a system of protection has been built around them. To reference a related problem, the number of Catholic priests who abused children is ultimately a small group, but the Church itself hid the facts and fostered an environment where they could keep abusing children. The whole Church is therefore accountable. Same with political systems.
What I hear is that there is a large group of people in the government protecting pedophiles. Do we have any evidence of this?
Yes. Every time you hear a Republican screaming about drag queens grooming children, they are deflecting the focus off of themselves.