this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
536 points (96.9% liked)

News

23608 readers
3510 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SCB 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The point here is that civilians aren't going to defeat the US military, full stop. Whether sane people have guns or fascists have guns, only the military matters

[–] Riccosuave -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Vietnam and Afghanistan would like to have a word with you about that...

[–] SCB 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Might wanna check the actual combat statistics there bud. Shit Vietnam was also a professional, well-supplied army with a decade of combat experience against the French and massive infrastructure advantages.

This is home turf, not foreign soil that's attempting to be occupied peacefully. Plus, you'd have 50% of a country, give or take, readily willing to turn you in or attack you themselves, and 0 logistics infrastructure.

It's amazing to me this take is still common with people when it's so easily laughed at.

If you wanna go hide in the woods with your buddies, you can do that without trying to overthrow the government.

[–] Riccosuave 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was responding to your previous point that a standing military is all that matters against an occupied civilian force. I don't think that really bears up to scrutiny in historical terms.

Also, I don't know where you got off thinking I'm trying to LARP as a militia member, but nice strawman with absolutely zero background to support that conclusion...

[–] SCB 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t think that really bears up to scrutiny in historical term

Then, frankly, you're wrong.

Also, I don’t know where you got off thinking I’m trying to LARP as a militia member

it was a generalized "you"

[–] Riccosuave 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then, frankly, you're wrong.

Cool, but you could have just said that initially without being kind of an asshole.

it was a generalized "you"

Well since you said it to me, how else was I supposed to take that.

Anyways, not mad at you. Was more just making a joke initially, but maybe in bad faith. Which, by the way, I was more than willing to admit.

[–] SCB 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not mad at you either dude. Sorry for the poor phrasing leading to this confusion.

[–] Riccosuave 2 points 1 year ago

It's fine. I know there's a lot of heightened emotions and frustrations in this thread already, so I probably should have just used my better judgement by saying nothing. I knew what you meant with your initial statement, which I also generally agree with.

In hindsight, I think I was expressing my own personal frustration with the US involvement in those two conflicts which ultimately just lead to more dead civilians and US service members rather than approximating anything close to resolution of a justifiable conflict. Add that to the current situation unfolding in the Middle East, and I was just hip firing some stupid quippy retort where it wasn't needed. So, again, my bad.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I think the more important point is that people form militias to protect themselves, and carrying a weapon means considering bad thoughts and being aware of them, the same way that an ex drug user or addict practicing abstinence consistently needs to exert a degree of self discipline.

If you ask me, owning a gun just makes violent assholes have a shorter fuse. Think about it, have you ever carried a stick or a knife and thought that carrying it meant something? Now you can be more assertive, but the risk of accidentally shooting people or just flying off the handle and shooting someone suddenly becomes a real risk.

A great test would be to give recent licensed gun owners three rubber bullets to use. When you get around to firing it after losing your shit you'll know that you really lost your cool.

[–] wanderingmagus -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We absolutely had the military capability to wipe Vietnam and Afghanistan off the goddamn map and delete their populations and wildlife from existence if ordered to do so. The politicians back home said no, and made us withdraw. We have thousands of nuclear reentry vehicles standing ready, and we are trained to set condition 1SQ when ordered, no questions asked, without knowing the target package. I challenge you to survive a hundred Hiroshimas per warhead, times several thousand.

[–] Riccosuave 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

See my other comments below. I'm not looking to have an argument about nuclear war with a nuclear submariner. When you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail and whatnot.