this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
668 points (97.2% liked)

Sysadmin

7717 readers
2 users here now

A community dedicated to the profession of IT Systems Administration

No generic Lemmy issue posts please! Posts about Lemmy belong in one of these communities:
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm so absolutely sick of it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Maalus 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sooo currently they are saving money playing multiple games that they most likely won't replay in the future anyway.

Why the hostility if it's a good deal for them? Just to own a game on the tiniest chance you'll play it later? Or just rent till you find a game you like and will play multiple times, buy to own it and also play multiple other games on the pass.

[–] elbarto777 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sure. Until you can't own games anymore because of everyone enabling these companies.

[–] friend_of_satan 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This sounds so slippery slope hypothetical, but this is exactly what Adobe did with Photoshop, Lightroom, and more, which shows that this is actually happening right now.

[–] droans 3 points 1 year ago

I don't think Microsoft will do so, at least in the foreseeable future. One of their selling points to devs is that they'll see their sales go up in addition to the GP revenue. There would be a lot of publishers who would pull out if they can't sell their game and have it on GP.

They might do it for their own games, but even that could be a stretch. Starfield saw huge sales on both Xbox and PC in addition to those who are using GamePass.

[–] Maalus 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure. Until everyone buying up the game results in $200 copies for a 5 hour game since there are no alternatives and everyone was enabling it by buying bad games.

Slippery slope is a fallacy for a reason. There is no evidence of rent only games comming anytime soon, it's just doomsaying.

[–] elbarto777 -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Maalus -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah it is, you have no proof of the "rent only" future you are doomsaying about. Movies used to be mostly rented out, yet this hasn't led to the "rent only" situation, quite the opposite.

[–] thantik 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Movies used to be mostly rented out, yet this hasn't led to the "rent only" situation, quite the opposite.

WAT? Is there some sort of massive increase in people buying blu-rays or something that I'm unaware of?

This has LITERALLY become our reality with movies. It's not something far off in the future, it IS TODAY. Nobody buys movies or songs anymore, they have to pay for a SERVICE to listen to music, tv shows, and movies...

[–] elbarto777 -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, it isn't, you have no proof of the "no rent only" future you're so sure is waiting for us.

[–] Maalus 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof - you are the one claiming the "rent only" future is comming and that people should "just buy the game" instead of going for gamepass. I don't have to debunk your insane claims, the burden of proof is on you.

[–] thantik -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

2 of us have literally provided the proof. Yet you're still here screaming "Slippery slope fallacy!"...

Yet we've shown you existing markets which are already there. We've already provided the proof.

[–] Maalus 3 points 1 year ago

You haven't provided proof. You just repeated your claims and expected people to react differently this time. I'll just stop replying to this thread if you don't mind. I dislike arguing with people who don't have anything sensible to say.