this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
679 points (97.5% liked)

News

23371 readers
5937 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Judge Newman has threatened to have staff arrested, forcibly removed from the building, and fired. She accused staff of trickery, deceit, acting as her adversary, stealing her computer, stealing her files, and depriving her of secretarial support. Staff have described Judge Newman in their interactions with her as “aggressive, angry, combative, and intimidating”; “bizarre and unnecessarily hostile”; making “personal accusations”; “agitated, belligerent, and demonstratively angry”; and “ranting, rambling, and paranoid.” Indeed, interactions with Judge Newman have become so dysfunctional that the Clerk of the Court has advised staff to avoid interacting with her in person or, when they must, to bring a co-worker with them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Quick solution for situations like this: compulsive retirement.

65 years old? Get out of here or get thrown out.

[–] Vodik_VDK 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Disagree-ish.

I would suggest that, instead, after a certain age or catastrophic loss (such as that of a lifetime partner) we should all be receiving regular competency / cognizants evaluations. I think that compulsive retirement would be dehumanizing, a potential trigger for senility, dementia, or suicide, and a negligent misappropriation of the experience and institutional knowledge, that many of our seniors hold.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Most modern countries contemplate the notion that at some point in your life you are deemed unfit of occupying an active position, regardless whatever experience an individual may have in whatever field.

What that does not imply is the individual being rendered useless. Highly experienced individuals can act as teachers, mentors and advisers, sharing experience but with no weight for actual decision making or action taking.

I myself don't intend to reach retirement age and turn off all switches and just stay home and vegetate; I think I can make myself useful up until my body becomes too frail and my mind breaks. But there is a point where I don't want to have any responsabilities towards an institution.

[–] Smoogs 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
[–] Nurse_Robot 1 points 1 year ago

1 is not the same as 2

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Care to elaborate on that, please? I'm not following your reasoning.

[–] Smoogs -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s Because you’re being an ageist.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're going to have to elaborate on your reasoning. One sentence makes no service to explain yourself.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

if you applied this unilaterally you'll end up with a lot of homeless old people

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Surely we can find a sensible middle ground between allowing senile elderly folks to hold positions of power and kicking every 65 year old out of every job lmao.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean yeah you'd think so but also I was just responding to the top comment

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure they were referring to judges specifically.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 1 points 1 year ago

What about homeless former judges?

Have you considered them?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why?

In my very backwards and barbaric country every person, regardless of their profession, receives a state paid pension and we have a notion of social safety net. There are homeless here, like everywhere else in the world, but elderly citizens can retire knowing they will be taken care of.

On the particular case of judges, and on this I have the luck to have been explained how things work, upon reaching 65, a judge is retired and recognized by their service, with a very generous pension, as the career is considered as being of high strain.

No one should be forced nor allowed to work until their dying breath and this is a prime example for it.

[–] archiotterpup 2 points 1 year ago

75 seems more reasonable