this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
203 points (88.0% liked)

FediLore + Fedidrama

2159 readers
164 users here now

Rules

  1. Any drama must be posted as an observer, you cannot post drama that you are involved with.
  2. When posting screenshots, you must obscure the identity of all the participants.

Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)

Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.

Includes lore like how a instance got it's name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc

(New) This sub's intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don't get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama

Tags: fediverse news, lemmy news, lemmyverse

Partners:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

We need the ability to tag users on Lemmy so that when we figure out that someone is a tankie or an anti-Canadian propagandist we can tag them so that the next time we see them comment we know they are a bad faith actor and can respond appropriately (and by appropriately I mean not wasting our time trying to have a good faith discussion.)

EDIT:

NegativeYoda said that Sync for Lemmy had the functionality I was looking for so I checked it out.

It does.

I was able to (temporarily) highlight NY in red like a banned user and tag him as a tankie. This week makes my lemmy experience much less frustrating. I've ashtray done the same (for real) to several obvious bad actors so I don't get drawn into a discussion with someone who has no intention of participating in good faith.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Basically how I used the Reddit Enhancement Suite tag manager.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yes. There are several users here now who are bad faith actors. It would be great to be able to tag them. That way I wouldn't try to engage in conversation just to become frustrated by their bad faith arguments and insults before recognizing their names. I don't want to block them because I want to be able to make good faith responses to their nonsense but I want to know that they're trolls so I don't get involved in a discussion that isn't going to go anywhere.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (17 children)

Thanks for doing that. I have a similar approach.

I really want federated social media to work, and the extremist propaganda is killing it.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I feel that the ability to tag users is the only thing that Lemmy is missing for me. Maybe all of the actions of these bad actors will inspire the creation of a tagging system.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Check out my original comment for an update. Sync goes Lemmy does what I was looking for.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Just block and move on with your life.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

But someone might be wrong!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's pretty time consuming tagging people and I'm not sure it's worth the effort. I did it on reddit for a while but the supply of new assholes is basically endless.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Tagging people or blocking people is like a fraction of the time I spent on reddit, and its roughly the same here. And the benefit is the time saved not having to see or argue with bad faith actors.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

You know, I hadn't heard the term "tankie" before coming to Lemmy/Kbin, and at this point I'm lost again on what it's supposed to mean. I have a general idea but it seems to mostly just be a malleable catch-all for "someone I don't like who possible sort of leans one way a bit on some things". Like how "boomer" has become super over-ueed boogeyman term for "someone older than me I don't like".

Seems like a lazy way to categorize tribally, and group people as "others". Or am I getting it totally wrong?

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Tankies are auth left. They support the policies of Stalin, the CCP, et al and are staunch soviet union defenders and revisionists. It's an old term from the 80s in the UK

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

A planned state economy isn't a leftist ideal.

Leftism does its best to tear down hierarchies, tankies have a problem with the way economics are handled, and the existing hierarchies, but that's only because they want to be the ones in charge of both.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

What a tankie actually is, is a ML who supports violent force against a population - Hence being named after the Soviets driving tanks into Hungary to stop a revolution.

Right wingers have taken this word and think it applies to anything left wing they don’t like when it’s just a leftist anti-authoritarity term used for ML chuds.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Tankies are angry leftists. They're the alt-left that the extreme right always complains about. I suspect that many of them are actually neo-Nazi trolls trying to prove that they aren't so bad by cosplaying as tankies. They're bad faith actors.

[–] AngryCommieKender 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm an angry leftist, but I ain't no tankie. I'm pissed cause I'm middle aged, and have been dealing with over a century of outright lies from the rich.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm a pragmatic leftist. I know that being angry and demanding the murder of all rich people and government officials isn't going to happen. We need to get organized like the christofascists are and use the system. Until we do the christofascists will continue to rise.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The only reason I fear revolution is because I fear if my side wins, we'll govern peacetime as we would during war.

Really becomes hard to judge who your allies are when things get ugly, and there are way too many covert narcissists that know how to game their way to control.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

There won't be a revolution in Canada. If the tankies try there are only two possible outcomes. The tankies ends up in prison or the tankies end up dead. Your taking about using a few Gravy Seals with military style guns against a national armed forces and police that number in the hundreds of thousands with real military weapons, APCs, tanks, planes, etc. A bunch of military fetishist with murder fantasies don't stand a chance. It's all fun and games until a bullet rips through one of your comrades chests and it becomes obvious that they're shooting white people.

Just ask Ashley Babbit and the idiots that were around her when she died. The attack on the Senate wasn't as fun after that happened.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

Tankie is all about embracing the tanks. They're the authoritarian left.

Primary beliefs (all stupid and wrong): the Soviets and People's Liberation Army can do/did no wrong. Russia is still Soviet and still the good guys. Ukraine is a conspiracy from the West that is actually Nazi. Any geopolitical problems are the fault of the West who behaves as a complete bloc and is literally only motivated by the capital interest of billionaires. Africa and the subcontinent are the world good guys (just conveniently ignore literally anything bad that happens there). Lots of Islamophobia.

As with all authoritarians, it's all about conspiracy theories. If you try to argue with them, they simply don't believe counterfactuals or will shift goal posts and start talking about something else entirely.

Most of the angry leftists you encounter, especially in these parts, lean much more towards anarchism. Very different from tankies.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I recall someone saying the term originates somewhere online, and describes literally those who are cool with the tanks coming out and government authoritarianism, so long as the people being run over by the tanks are seen as fascist righties.

But the other comment sums it up pretty well, the lefty extremist Boogeyman is real, it's just a tiny minority being amplified. The right don't like 'em, the rest of us don't like 'em either.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

On the side of the Tienanmen Square tanks is how I originally saw it, though it apparently dates back to the Soviets sending tanks to squash the anti-Communist rebels in Hungary.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] negativeyoda 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sync has this functionality if you pay for it

I just use the very free and very effective block function

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My beliefs aren't so fragile that I need to protect them from beliefs that don't agree. We need to engage with the extremists. We need to call them out and let each other know that the person we are talking to is a bad faith actor who isn't interested in a discussion or understands but to simply spread their extremist message of hate and intolerance. If we block them they continue unchallenged.

[–] negativeyoda 4 points 1 year ago

If you have the energy for that, go nuts.

Being that the bulk of the loudmouths are bad faith trolls no sort of reasoned discussion is going to get through.

If enough people block them they eventually get quarantined into their own echo chambers and the oxygen of getting off on pwning the libs will run out

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If we block them they continue unchallenged.

That's why they should be blocked at the instance level, not individual users.

Engage them? No thanks. All that does is help train their LLMs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I don't like the idea of blocking people who have different ideas but who aren't otherwise doing anything problematic. I'm talking with someone this morning who has the most ridiculous ideas about how the world works. His ideas are just nonsense and he advances them with great confidence. I have him flagged so that as soon as I saw his name come up as red this morning I knew that I needed to slow down and careful about my response. I don't want to block him because the things he says offer a chance for people who know how the world works to respond, perhaps influencing the perception of a reader who comes along later.

If you want to block people, by all means block them, but you're taking yourself out of the conversation, not them. That was the problem with the blocking system on Reddit. If you blocked someone you took them out of the conversation. On Lemmy when you block someone you take yourself out of the conversation. Unless you want to operate in an echo bunker where you can only see people whose ideas agree with yours that's a bad thing.

load more comments (6 replies)