this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
1282 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

60090 readers
5363 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tilgare 61 points 1 year ago (2 children)

For that to be true, it would have needed to be worth $44B in the first place, which it absolutely was not. But there is no doubt that his mismanagement has tanked the value of the investment. He's a narcissist so never see it that way, but the whole rest of the world knows that.

[–] Kage520 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As a business? Probably not worth that valuation. As a propaganda machine to be able to influence a decent percentage of the population? I think it was.

[–] ozymandias117 1 points 1 year ago

Only because larger media outlets use it as “news”

Twitter has always been one of the smaller “social media” giants

[–] SocialMediaRefugee 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think he realized it wasn't worth what they claimed but he couldn't back out of the deal.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

AFAIK he had to be sued into buying it once he tried to weasel out of the deal. So it wasn't for lack of trying definitely 😂😂😂

[–] blady_blah 8 points 1 year ago

There was a clause in the contract that said if he backed out he would have to pay $1 billion. Who knew that would actually have saved him way more to exercise that clause.