this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
1178 points (96.9% liked)

Science Memes

11189 readers
3848 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
1178
research (discuss.tchncs.de)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
70 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ironically, doing research is the best way to be right. What people want is to feel right without having to think very hard. Feelings don’t really require energy in the same way that thinking does.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

More than just research is needed and that's what many miss. One must be able to reliably evaluate the quality of evidence to sort fact from baloney. Doing so requires critical thinking, the ability to be able to poke holes in theories regardless of whether you like them or not, and the willingness to be wrong and, above all else, the mental flexibility to update your knowledge when proven so. Not everyone is able to do that.

I am used to being wrong a lot so it comes naturally lol.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I end most of my thoughts with "but I may be wrong"

[–] Zekas 1 points 1 year ago

I start them like that. Anxiety is a bitch

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Plus the methodology. There’s an idea of actively seeking out research contrary to one’s hypothesis, this helps circumvent the confirmation bias of only looking for things that support a hypothesis and ignoring anything contradictory. It can be healthy to find and consider dissenting opinions.

Another fundamental issue is people using different meanings for similar words. Someone with a strong understanding of scientific method will say things like “I believe” or “studies show”, while someone else will say things like “This is” or “we know”. Colloquially the latter is stronger language conveying more confidence, but the former is more likely to be evidence based. “Theory” is used colloquially the way a scientist would use “hypothesis”. People will say “I have a theory”, that’s only a few sentences and doesn’t make any reliable predictions, the put down an actual theory backed by years of supporting evidence and peer review as “just a theory”.

[–] pennomi 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Feelings are SUPER important to humans because they’re a huge efficiency boost. We take everything we’ve ever learned in our lives and crunch it down into a feeling for how the world works. Then we make the vast majority of our decisions by using that “gut feeling”. Can you imagine how ridiculously inefficient it would be to have to analyze every new scenario you come across?

The big problem today is that people lean in too hard on that idea and assume that because their feelings are right most of the time, feelings must be equivalent to truth.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The problem is that the efficiency is achieved through shortcuts and biases. It'd those biases people need to be careful with.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Works fine when you’re a wild animal, not so much when you’re part of a society

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

In other words, shortcuts and biases really just trade accuracy for speed.

Those many cognitive biases we succumb to may be great for scenarios faced by hominids a hundred thousand years ago or more. But for sussing out truth and evaluating evidence, they're straight caca.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Can you imagine how ridiculously inefficient it would be to have to analyze every new scenario you come across?

I have adhd so I do not need to imagine it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Can you imagine how ridiculously inefficient it would be to have to analyze every new scenario you come across?