this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
2024 points (98.7% liked)
Political Memes
5598 readers
4078 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Everyone's. Because they're children.
Including the bourgeoisie?
Children aren't bourgeoisie, they're children.
I think can find you people from history who man disagree
Who cares about history? This is 2023. People in history would disagree with people today about slavery and marital rape too. Should we reconsider allowing those things?
Spicy take incoming, "history has nothing to teach us"
Okay, what does history have to teach us about feeding children? When does history say "don't feed children?" Go for it.
The wives and children of those arrested and executed were dealt with by the NKVD Order No. 00486. The women were sentenced to forced labour for 5 or 10 years.[77] Their minor children were put in orphanages. All possessions were confiscated. Extended families were purposely left with nothing to live on, which usually sealed their fate as well, affecting up to 200,000–250,000 people of Polish background depending on the size of their families.[77] The NKVD national operations were conducted on a quota system using album procedure. The officials were mandated to arrest and execute a specific number of so-called "counter-revolutionaries", compiled by administration using various statistics but also telephone books with names sounding non-Russian.[78]
Sorry... how is that an argument to not feed children? That sounds like a bad thing. Are you actually arguing that is good?
If you recall, we were talking about warnings from history. These children were not being fed, their bourgeois parents were being evicted sent to gulags and exterminated for owning a typewriter or a horse or something.
You said children were not bourgeois this is a lesson about the children of the "bourgeois"
That doesn't make the children themselves bourgeois. They have no control over the money or the circumstances under which they were born.
And, again, let's see your historical argument for not feeding children.
They don't have one, they're just a shitty little troll. They say the government shouldn't be feeding people, then say they aren't against free school lunches, because their only goal is to piss people off
I bet as they were being placed in to orphanages or starving with their mums they were thinking well this is very unfair we're not the "bourgeoisie"
Has it happens neither with their debt but the state of the USSR didn't seem to mind.
I can give you the example of present day where I live all children where I live get free school meals up to age 6. I don't need them I can afford to buy my own kids meals as can all the other parents at my school more or less, but we have no choice. Does that sound sensible to you?
For the record I am in favor of feeding needy children as I have said before but perhaps not to you
(I'm using voice to text it's a bit spotty)
No, they didn't know what 'bourgeoisie' meant because, and I can't stress this enough, THEY WERE CHILDREN. They didn't do anything to deserve that.
Jesus, why are you tarring children with the "crimes" of their parents?
"Crimes". Holy crap. TANKIE, WE HAVE A TANKIE OVER HERE.
Should I go to the gulag?
What are you even talking about? I'm not a tankie and you're the one using the actions of the USSR to say that children are bourgeois and don't deserve to be fed, which, I don't know, sounds kind of like something a tankie would say.
Yet again- Children are not bourgeois. And I put the word crimes in quotation marks. Do you really not know what it means when people do that? Do I really have to clarify that to you? Are you that illiterate?
And yes, we are having a discussion about the past. A discussion you implied would justify not feeding children. You have yet to do that.
I know. Neither were their parents. The people in charge thought they were, which I think was my point.
My lesson form history is what happens when you start labelling people in to groups and then treating them very badly based on group identity.
I started taking about this because you said children can't be bourgeois, which I agree with, but that didn't ultimately matter . Which is my "lesson from history".
We are taking about this because you wanted an example of what happened to bourgeois children who at least the children of the bourgeoisie, which is a lesson from history.
Hearing we have a caution retail about treating people badly based on group identity. Do you agree that is a useful lesson from history?
What does that have to do with feeding children? Did you forget what this post was about or something?