783
submitted 8 months ago by Pat12 to c/news
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 45 points 8 months ago

I mean, it's sexual assault obviously, but in this case, "using a sex toy on them" provides a bit more context than just generically labeling it as "sexual assault". Sexual assault could be many different things.

The article also goes on to describe that they put the sex toys in the men's mouth. I think the "used a sex toy on them" is just more descriptive in this situation, because if they used "sexual assault", people would not be able to decipher what these POS officers actually did.

I do agree that the media can be terrible about minimizing sexual assault on men, but in this case I think the headline is more descriptive. Also , fuck these racist rapist cops.

[-] ThatWeirdGuy1001 58 points 8 months ago

"Raped a man with a dildo"

Brings the same point across while accentuating what actually happened.

They raped him. They forcefully penetrated him with a fake penis. That's rape even according to the current bullshit definition.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago

I totally agree there. They should make it as graphic and specific as possible to really show how fucked up the situation is and show how terrible the perpetrators are, at least in my opinion.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

This & the word "torture" could also mean many things yet they used it as well

[-] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

I agree with the article only using the word rape to describe that they were threatened to be anally raped. I think calling everything rape dilutes the meaning of the word. Forcefully stuffing a plastic or silicon object in someone's mouth doesnt quite fit the word. Cops are absolute vile pieces of shit and I'm annoyed I had to read the article to know what the misleading headline was talking about. The comments weren't helping either.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

You "use a sex toy" on a partner.

It's not a sex toy when you don't consent; at that point, it's just being raped with a foreign object.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I agree. I never said anything different either. I am just saying that this provides more context than sexual assault. If I was in charge of the headline it would probably be "rapist and racist cops torture and rape suspects mouth with sex toy." But I'm not. As an observer, I felt more informed by the headline than if it just said sexual assault or rape, and you were more informed, too.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

I reread your comment after I replied and realized I sounded like I was accusing you of otherwise. Not my intention and thanks for the note.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

He wasn’t raped. He was subjected to enhanced interrogation. Besides, they sprinkled some crack on him so it’s all good.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

"Raped with a sex toy" is more descriptive and accurate and almost the same length (shorter even) as "used a sex toy on them."

this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
783 points (99.0% liked)

News

21130 readers
4646 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS