this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
307 points (92.1% liked)

Technology

59665 readers
3476 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

When China's prodigious tech influencer, Naomi Wu, found herself silenced, it wasn't just the machinery of a surveillance state at play. Instead, it was a confluence of state repression and the sometimes capricious attention of a Western audience that, as she asserts, often views Chinese activists more as ideological tokens than as genuine human beings.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Why are they going after people who are supportive of them?

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago

The short answer is that she reported a security vulnerability in a popular Android keyboard. It basically operated as a keylogger. The logical assumption is that the government was using that to spy on people (even people using secure messengers) and did not appreciate the secret getting out to the public.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

Because they are fascists with power. You can praise them all day every day but when it comes down if you are different in any way they will see you as a deviant and a sickness.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Because of the reasons in the article?

[–] NeoNachtwaechter 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why are they going after people

Seems you haven't read the second half of the title, as well as the second half of the article.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

TBH I had trouble getting past

As an example, here she is comprehensively breaking down the capabilities (or lack thereof) of a high-tech filtration mask in a manner which is likely to be beyond your understanding

Just... Why?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It felt very condescending :/

I think you can congratulate or acknowledge someone's talents or skills without being off putting towards those who don't have them. I think the stuff the maker does is incredible and the tone by the journalist is strange, I would really like to know their reasoning to get a better understanding.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because it's not enough.
She wasn't enough.
She doesn't fit the box perfectly.
And she was too popular to ignore.