this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
167 points (97.7% liked)

Movies

7224 readers
113 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Related Communities:

[email protected] - Discussing books and book-related things.

[email protected] - A place to discuss comic books of all types.

[email protected] - LW's home for all things MCU.


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.uk/post/1842280

Talking to the Happy Sad Confused podcast, the John Wick director suggested his approach to the new film in development will be to launch a potential series of films. He says the idea is to not rush the first movie to the original film’s conclusion — which crowned MacLeod the sole survivor of a group of dueling immortals following their climactic Gathering.

“I think we have some very good elements now,” he said. “The trick is when you have the tagline, ‘There can only be one,’ you can’t just kill everybody the first time.”

Stahelski also said the film will incorporate elements of the 1992 syndicated Highlander TV series, which ran for six seasons.

“Our story engages a lot of the same characters, but we’ve also brought in elements of all the TV shows,” Stahelski said. “We’re trying to do a bit of a prequel — a setup to The Gathering — so we have room to grow the property.”

He noted he hasn’t thought of John Wick as a franchise (despite that Continental TV show coming) but he does see Highlander as a potential franchise.

“We have ideas for days for the coolest characters [that could make for] an epic TV show,” he said. “I just think that’s rich mythology when you can pick any period of time, any nationality, any culture, any type of person and make them an immortal that have to duel and deal with the burden of immortality — that’s fucking cool.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Touching_Grass 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Why not reboot though. Its one of those things I don't think really I want to go away. It saves so much time. I already know the story and characters. I don't need 6 seasons and 2 films to build the mythos. Its all built into it.

[–] ummthatguy 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It could work. Reset Raiden (er, Christopher Lambert) in Sean Connery's role. Introduce known and new immortals while slow feeding a build up to the Quickening. Just try to avoid any of what happened with 2. Just, no.

[–] ConstipatedWatson 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hold on a sec, you don't want them to use any of the Highlander 2 revolutionary ideas?

/s

Seriously though, trying to reboot Highlander might actually work. It's a known property, but really only the first movie had any value (and some of the TV series) and it's not that well known from younger generations. It's also not such a classic that you cannot touch it without people screaming (like, say, Ghostbusters)

Edit: grammar

[–] Couldbealeotard 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Except all reboots waste time retelling the very beginning of a characters development because they are banking on starting a franchise.

How many reboots are stories about the lead up to the character becoming the character? This sounds like we won't even get to the "there can only be one" finale before the franchise is cancelled.

[–] Touching_Grass 5 points 1 year ago

Yea that's a waste. But not all. James bond is a good example. You just start the story and go

[–] thessnake03 2 points 1 year ago

Could be straightforward enough. Just start with his death and then he wakes up. Mild confusion, but Conner finds him quick enough to explain the basics, your immortal now, there can be only one, we've done this before but something new fucked it up.

He can either be the new Sean Connery as a mentor, or have him get instakilled by our big bad.

We can see Carvell deal with his old life (perhaps someone had him killed, aka mafia?) and the new immortal world he got sucked into.

.... Or maybe I just wrote it the way you said sucks, I'm not sure

[–] Nastybutler 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ahem, every reboot of a Batman or Spider-Man movie starts with another origin, except maybe the Pattinson Batman, I can't remember

[–] Sovereign_13 4 points 1 year ago

Battinson didn’t really do an origin. He’s a younger Batman, and they touch somewhat on his parents’ death, but they don’t like…re-enact the run-up to him becoming Batman. He’s just Batman.

FWIW I rather liked The Batman. I liked the more noire-detective element that often seems to be missing from Batman movies.