this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
1226 points (98.3% liked)

Memes

45736 readers
2384 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GCanuck 375 points 1 year ago (4 children)

“You’re in contempt of court. You have been fined $x and continued refusal to swear the oath will land you in prison until you do. Jackass.”

That’s what the judge does.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's really a process of letting the subpoenaed know that they either tell the truth, lie and face perjury charges, or refuse and face contempt or court charges. The latter can seemingly land you in jail in perpetuity. Because fuck you, I guess?

[–] FederatedSaint 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Does the "right to remain silent" still apply?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's mostly for police. Once you're in court and ordered to testify, the person talking about germany is mostly correct. You can't be forced to self-incriminate nor testify against a spouse. Otherwise yes. Generally 99% of courts won't bother even asking the defendant to testify because self-incrimination is practically guaranteed. Usually only if the defense calls on them, which is often a bad idea.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Please state your name"

"I can't do that without incriminating myself"

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Mr. Stealsalot,
We meet again

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I just talked about Germany because I didn't knew how it is in the US. Apparently it's exactly the same. Intresting comment

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Only if there’s a risk at incriminating yourself, and if it’s not immediately apparent how you’d run that risk (e.g. you’re a witness that doesn’t have a direct relation to the crime at hand) you’d have to motivate how it could be incriminating.

[–] PunnyName 35 points 1 year ago (4 children)

What if you were coerced into testifying?

[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 year ago

Then you plead the 5th. Pretty sure that's exactly what it's intended for.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

You mean by a court subpoena? If so then you testify or get found in contempt of court.

Or do you mean what if someone is threatened/blackmailed into giving false testimony? If that's the case then you should probably go to the police. If it's law enforcement who are coercing you then I suppose you could try to include that fact in the testimony, but there may not be much difference in that and refusing to comply with the blackmailer in the first place, in terms of your safety.

If you're coerced to lie under oath then I'd guess that still counts as perjury, but I doubt most judges would be mad at you for it; they'd shit fury all over whoever was coercing you.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

You speak to your lawyer ahead of time and they discuss the issue with the judge.

[–] aoidenpa 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If that's the best the judge can do, I feel sorry for them. And I will leave it at that.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

IDK, imprisoning a person until they either comply or the trial concludes without them seems pretty good for the judge. Bad for the person subpoenaed, but it's no skin of the judge's back

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I walk up to the goddamn judge and hand him my $25 dollars and say "Here's my money, now I am leaving!" And I left it at that.