this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
748 points (97.5% liked)

Murdered by Words

401 readers
1 users here now

Responses that completely destroy the original argument in a way that leaves little to no room for reply - a targeted, well-placed response to another person, organization, or group of people.

The following things are not grounds for murder:

Rules:

  1. Be civil and remember the human. No name calling or insults. Swearing in general is fine, but not to insult someone else.
  2. Discussion is encouraged but arguments are not. Don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguments sake.
  3. No bigotry of any kind.
  4. Censor the person info of anyone not in the public eye.
  5. If you break the rules you’ll get one warning before you’re banned.
  6. Enjoy the community in the light hearted way it’s intended.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The “Readers added context” feature is the only good thing about Twitter.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Is this legit? That isn’t just ironic, but that last line is racists as hell. I mean, I’m fairly certain he’s racist if this is real or not but that last part was just so explicit in it

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I think (I hope) the last line is from a completely different post, not a reply to the black woman. Tbh I thought it must have been a reply to someone with an NFT chimp avatar. It’s much nicer here in my naïve/sheltered mind than the real world 😕

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

it has to be because if he actually blocked her she wouldn't be able to reply to his tweets anymore

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

It's a different post/thread - you can tell from the time lines with the chimp one being made in 2018. However, no idea what the context of that was, and I'm not going to use Xitter to find out.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think she’s attaching his chimp comment in her reply as a way of displaying his hypocrisy.

But I’m not sure. I’ve never used Twitter and always find the screenshots stupid to read.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I didn’t use twitter before Elon bought it, and have stayed much further away since he has. It’s possible I’m misreading due to something like that, but if I am that’s also poor design. It looks like a legitimate reply to hers. If users can manipulate replies in line with their tweets that just makes the site even worse

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m not a big Twitter user but how you know this isn’t a reply; firstly the date. The chimp tweet is 7 years old, the block conversation is from 3 days ago. Secondly, you see the white vertical lines between musks first and second tweet? That indicates it’s part of the same thread. The chimp tweet doesn’t have one because the woman has “quote tweeted” something he said in the past. Finally you see how “blocked” is in bold in his last tweet? That happens when you search for a word - it appears in bold in the results. I believe the woman went to musk’s profile and searched all his tweets for “blocked”. Then she quote tweeted it back to him in this conversation.

[–] glimse 5 points 1 year ago

This is correct on all counts, it's a quoted tweet. What we're seeing is the "thumbnail" of the link. Click it and go to the post

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

After looking again I did notice the chimp comment is dated 2018, so I believe I’m correct

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

He's a white South African who's daddy made his money with slave labor. He's definitely a racist.