this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
1697 points (97.1% liked)

Memes

46728 readers
1068 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] StarManta 104 points 2 years ago (37 children)

Trying to claim the term “Web3” is a futile battle. It is already widely understood to mean crypto and blockchain. If I see a job posting that says the company is built on Web3, I know immediately that the job is built on scams and grifts without having to ask further questions. Web3 as a term is ruined already.

For this to work it must be a different term than Web3. Maybe “Web 3.0” is different enough?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I suggest forking Web3 into at least three competing things

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

as long as they all compete to be the standard, and aren't going to communicate with each other well, I'm in!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

Can Web3-D be unnecessary VR integration?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Just do what USB does and call it "Web 3 v2"

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

Note that not all Web 3 v2 final (1) features are required to be labeled Web 3 v2 final (1). Please consult vendor documentation to determine which features are supported on their device.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Web 3 v2 final (1)++ Remastered Advanced with Knuckles Pro Edition

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Is it the Japanese Director's Cut?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

also Web 3.0 was already a thing (semantic web), cryptobros just stole the term.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_Web

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

Which is pretty much what activitypub is a part of.

[–] cxfredeper 22 points 2 years ago (2 children)

"Web x" is dumb marketing speak. It exists because people who use the phrase can't intelligently talk about the actual underlying technology.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

I think it's useful terminology, but only very generally and in hindsight. Web 1 is a pretty clear era in the 90s and early 2000s, characterized by simple static blogs and personal websites, and email. Everyone knew this would be big, but nobody figured out how, that was the dotcom bubble. Web 2 began with the rise of big tech companies like Google and Facebook in the late 2000s, it has been characterized by social media apps, centralized platforms hosting user created content, funded by targeted advertising and data mining. Web apps became possible and smartphones took over. Every product became a subscription service.

I think we're at the start of web 3, but it's hard to say what that is yet. The big tech companies are crumbling and there's increasing unrest at the old system of web 2. Fed up users are turning to platforms like this. There's a lot of demand for crypto nonsense like NFTs. AI is changing the way we do everything.

I hope that web 3 is the age of decentralization because that would be awesome, but it's impossible to predict the future.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Abusing terminology, especially by marketers, is frustrating and cringe. But don’t underestimate the value in having a simple, shared term to describe a paradigm many things fit into.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Or perhaps Web 3.1. But seriously, I would call it the Federated Web.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Can’t quite put my finger on it but something about this doesn’t sit right with me

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago
[–] antisuck 7 points 2 years ago

Web 3.1 for Workgroups?

[–] linearchaos 6 points 2 years ago

It's not a bad idea but federated is the term they're using to tell everybody not to get off reddit because it's too confusing.

I think whatever name you give it they're going to try to sell it as being too confusing.

You could call it distributed web but they'll taint that as soon as you stick it in front of them

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Blockchain and crypto are both decentralized, which is exactly what Web3 is defined as. Just because they came before federated websites doesn't mean the definition is exclusive to them. I would call "Web3" ruined, rather I would say that ActivityPub is the first great implementation of it.

PS: The distinction between Web 3 and Web 3.0 is giving me some real USB 3.2 Gen 1 vibes.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Web3 usually means it's decentralized. So yes, in most cases it's cryptocurrencies

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

But most cryptocurrencies aren't decentralized!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What? That's the whole point of crypto currencies.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

Not the scams, which are most cryptocurrencies.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Web 3.0 was the semantic web.

[–] CookieOfFortune 4 points 2 years ago

How about Fweb or Feb?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago
[–] Astroturfed 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hey, it has so many uses. I can't name a good one that isn't actively being made a scam, but so many uses. Wave of the future. Buy crypto, trust me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

"Is not about the technology, it's about the money."

load more comments (26 replies)